Marc wrote on Jul 11^th, 2015 at 8:45pm:

I never meant to offend you. I was merely questioning whether anyone has the right to abuse and swear at first-time posters.

I'll do my best not to be so highly offensive in future.

  " I find their whining to be highly offensive "

   I was trying to think of a good retort to such a statement, but the tears rolling down my face, cracking me up, reading such a post !     for once I'm stumped !

We shall try to be more considerate of your feelings "princess" in future posts, heaven forbid we offend the likes of you in anything we may post  !
that statement needs its own thread !
its a classic !   well done Marc.
I think its only your 4 mates that seriously give a damn whether your offended or not !
200 odd posts in 16 years hardly compares to the hundreds Brian and others have contributed in helping new comers.
but keen to learn your secret brotherhood handshake   
what an absolute tool  "edit"  of a thing to say !
It seems to be, that some that have been on the forum for a lengthy time, seem to feel a superiority or greater than thou attitude !   Me, I judge people on what they say now, I don't care much for ones history, your judged on what you do now, not 15 years ago with a "buddy" 
   Perhaps D.J can set up an " old crusties section" could be set up for those with issues and they can bitch amongst themselves ! criticise everything be rude and cantankerous to each other resite how things were done in the "old days" and how great they are, or were ! 
Hell,  I'd pop over there for a laugh too
                         


colin

Marc wrote on Jul 11^th, 2015 at 8:45pm:


Marc,  If I have mis- understood your post, please feel free to explain how ?
what have I missed ?

regards
colin

Seems as if the unwashed have gone from attacking my one word Bullshit reply to our one post add by the chiro to attacking some of us old timers. Bullshit.

         Potter

Quote:

Nope.  Just aim your vitriol in the right direction.

        Potter

Ok......now this thread has become nothing but a pissing contest.  Shut it down or I will shut it down.

    

gidday Lancashire,
      agree with most of what you posted, great post.
and I mean that.
My only retort would be that if " multiple studies" showed that an elevated use of D3 carries with it a potential of death from heart disease, that's great, but there have been more studies contradicting this fact and even more evidence on record that there has never been a reported death of elevated use of D3. That's a fact.
Including I might add a clinical study in place measuring the effects of D3 on Alzheimer patents !  I think your very selective in facts you put up, or very very under researched.
we all know for a fact, cigarette smoking causes lung cancer among other things, so its an invalid comparison.  but there's yet to be factual evidence of the studies you quote.
D3 is not for everyone, its a choice, but when you chimed in on a conversation calling someones decision to titrate up and called it ridiculous and dangerous ( from memory) it then became your personal beliefs from unquantified studies which to date cant be validated.
Its the same thing that you ask of people not to criticise or judge  on your use of indomethacin, should also mean the same with you telling someone not to titrate up, can you see the comparison I'm making here ?
Recently Batch got hung and quartered by a poster for potentially scaring people into not using conventional drugs because he put up the factual death rates from commonly used CH treatment drugs !  If you could point to some factual, documented deaths or heart disease caused by elevated use of D3, not "multiple studies" Then you would have a right to advise posters of that documented evidence, as you did.
Listen, that's water under the bridge, we both got our points across, but don't expect me or anyone else to agree and take every word you say as fact and not open for debate, that's never going to happen, you believe in one lot of evidence, but many more of us believe in other medical papers contradicting yours.    Its our choice, just like your indomethacin choice, you have to accept we don't follow your path and mindset.
but apart from that, I do hope an alternative to indomethacin turns up for you, that's horrible stuff, but we take what we need, no one deserves to be in pain.
  On the ongoing nature of this post, well, nothing and I mean nothing justifies abusive responses to new posters, whether they be Ch sufferers or even spammers. I wouldn't care if it was a moderator ( only an example  ) or the fossel mob who seem to think the length of time gives them a dispensation on how they act. Hopefully this thread ends, as I think everyone has expressed how they feel and that should be that I suppose, this is my last post on the issue. 
all the best
colin

Hey Lancashire,

Why your last post ?????

Peter.

I thought they were bumm's.

Fossel?  Would that be The Queens English? 

        Potter

BobG wrote on Jul 14^th, 2015 at 9:42am:


Oh, heck - another fossil has reared his head!

You're just another one of those awful crusty people that went out of your way to actually help other CH sufferer's in person, one-on-one - without using distance as a deterrent. In fact, you drove through the desert all the way to Las Vegas almost daily. (And no, Cluster support did not start there!)

Nice to see someone who knows that "carbs" can also mean Holley, Rochester and (shudder) Carter...... Hope you are keeping your cams lumpy, your valves polished and your headers tubes blown out!

Marc