Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
Clusterheadaches.com
 
Search box updated Dec 3, 2011... Search ch.com with Google!
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegisterEvent CalendarBirthday List  
 





Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print
One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion (Read 16286 times)
DJ
YaBB Administrator
*****
Offline


Boyz Rule!


Posts: 7480456
Wichita, KS
Gender: male
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #25 - Feb 19th, 2009 at 7:47pm
 
...maybe

Undecided

yup, it's fixed.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 19th, 2009 at 7:49pm by DJ »  

I NEVER could have imagined! (April 11th, 1998 - present).  Adversity does not build character... it reveals it.
WWW 588277454  
IP Logged
 
monty
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 1056
The Swamp, Florida
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #26 - Feb 19th, 2009 at 8:37pm
 
Thanks, DJ - I may have crashed it with too many quotes and not closing the tags ... sorry if that was the problem. Will be more careful.

Quote:
That aspect of CH has been looked at and many treatments have been based on that but so far the results are mixed. CH is a very complex condition and simply raising serotonin level or maintaining serotonin level has not given us the answer.


I agree that the serotonin level alone cannot explain everything, which is why I have brought in other factors - the type, number, and sensitivity of different serotonin receptors, for example. Undoubtedly, there are other things (like calcium channels, magnesium deficiency, choline issues, etc), but for purposes of discussion, am focusing on serotonin. We can't consider everything at once (well, some might be able to, but we can only communicate in a reduced, linear fashion which smashes the true form).

Quote:
There is a very strict control of the amount of serotonin in the brain, regulated by the hypothalamus. External factors that affect the overall serotonin level in the body does not have much direct effect on that in the brain.


I don't believe that. It has been shown that a diet low in tryptophan, or lactose or fructose intolerance (which reduces tryptophan absorption) lowers serotonin levels in the blood and is associated with anxiety, depression, and other problems of the nervous system. Because tryptophan must be actively transported into the brain, it is possible that this transmission system can be impaired, or that other amino acids compete with tryptophan and reduce levels.  My worst two years of cluster headaches were when I was living with what (in obvious hindsight now) was an undiagnosed/misdiagnosed fructose intolerance.  Which is not to reduce all clusters to that one theory, merely to accept it may have been an issue for me and some others.

Quote:
...  However, one needs to be able to evaluate the practical implication of each hypothesis. One can never get  funding for a proper study or lab experiment unless practical applications can be demonstrated.


I personally have no plans of jumping through all the hoops required for getting funding for a 'proper' study. While experimental science can be quite useful, my personal approach is to use these discussions as something like the journal Medical Hypotheses - it is mostly paradigmatic examination and thought experiments, but it is a very useful journal. Then I try what works for me, as ultimately, no one cares if a treatment works 40% of the time, or 70% of the time, we care what works for each of us.

Quote:
So far, the hypothesis discussed failed to address one of the most peculiar and important aspect of CH : the clockwork timing of the hits and the seasonal feature of the cycle. Is there any way you can reconcile the above hypothesis to this aspect of CH ? [quote]

Yes, this is a good point.  For me, hits are always in summer, when days are longest (and melatonin is lowest). And the same time each day, like a alarm clock. But others may be winter only, or spring and fall, or chronic, or seemingly random.

From a big-picture standpoint, I take a cybernetic / systems theory approach to clusters. The brain/body is a complex entity, something destabilizes this system, which at times responds in a regular way, sometimes in a chaotic way.  The encouraging (and discouraging) thing about systems theory is that there can be hundreds of things that make a positive difference, but also hundreds of things that make things worse, and there is no telling which things work for which people. On the other hand, some factors are more central or prime to the mechanism, so these are obviously more important.

[quote]
On another point, although the level of cerebral serotonin is relatively stable, and so is the level of melatonin, there is a significant variant present between day and night and even during the awake or asleep state, both levels ebb and flow according to the circadian rhythm. Again this is regulated by the hypothalamus. How do you propose to correct the level of serotonin with regards to this constant variant ?


I know of no evidence that cerebral serotonin and melatonin are relatively stable or that they can never be sub-optimal. Also, it has been shown that episodic clusterheads have an abnormally weak melatonin curves (little or no variation between day and night), even when in remission.  Perhaps the most important part of the brain for melatonin is the pineal gland, not the hypothalamus; though there is clearly a functional axis between the two structures.

So I don't believe in that constant variant - the evidence is that the pineal gland and hypothalamus SCN aren't working properly, but no one knows why yet.


Quote:
Please understand that I am (not?) criticizing anything or anyone.


No, I don't take it that way. We are all discussing ideas and sometimes criticizing parts of the ideas and kicking the tires on our conceptual cars, which is good. If an idea is true or useful, it will survive.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 19th, 2009 at 8:45pm by monty »  

The outer boundary of what we currently believe is feasible is far short of what we actually must do.
 
IP Logged
 
Gonzalo
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I Love CH.com!


Posts: 43
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #27 - Feb 19th, 2009 at 9:00pm
 
First, thanks for the fixing work. Superbe.

Hello, Annsie

I'll try try to give you a global answer while I comment on specific points on your message. It's clear that CH is complex, so here we are crumbling as we can. I don't know what kind of "answer" ar you looking for, I settled myself today with a better quality of life, and now I'm going there.

Nor do I understand on the basis of which states that maintain or increase levels of serotonin did not give the reply. I think, at your words, that already tried to do this, otherwise left to know if it has been really achieved. And no, I think, there's not an "answer", but a long way to go. I share the words of monty: "If a serotonin deficiency is a main cause of clusters (as was asserted above), there is much that can be done in response to that.".

Nor do I share other statements, such as the level of serotonin is strictly controlled, and by the hypothalamus. If you want to comment on where you read this, it would be a good contribution to the discussion, because nothing that I've studied so far supports that idea at all.

Moreover, in the first post I explain the circadian and circanual rhythms based on the hypothesis. It's the first thing I did, it might not please everyone and of course it's subject to discussion, but I did. Please review it.

And if we withdraw the alleged control of the hypothalamus, and we agree that lower levels at night (up to 80% lower than on the day), and if I say that 2% of serotonin is in the brain, 8% in platelets and 90% in the intestine and that we are interested in 2% and 8% and not only at brain's 2%, we can continue to seek ways to increase these levels.

But again as we move through the discussion we'll arrive to practical conclusions, but surely not "the answer" yes, but, as I said, to a better quality of life. I hope.

Salut.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Gonzalo
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I Love CH.com!


Posts: 43
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #28 - Feb 19th, 2009 at 9:11pm
 
Hello again. Here's a partial info to polish.

The hydroxy-methoxy-indoles pathway of the triptofan

Apart from that we should increase the global availability of tryptophan, and the specific availability  to this pathway (complex and relevant issue that we still need to discuss), here is a summary of the metabolism of tryptophan via the hydroxy-methoxy-indoles and indoles derived from them.

This pathway consumes 3% of ingested tryptophan (from 2-5%). The process is as follows:

1) Tryptofhan + enzyme T-tryptophan hydroxylase (TPOH) + cofactor tetrahidrobiopterín => 5-Hydroxytryptophan (5HTP).

2) 5HTP + 5-Hydroxytryptophan decarboxylase + cofactor priridoxal phosphate => serotonin (5HT).  Note: pyridoxine phosphate (vitamin B6) + Riboflavin (vitamin B2) => pyridoxal phosphate.

3) The serotonin can follow these paths:

    A) 5HT + monoamine oxidase (MAO) + AldDH? => 5-hydroxy-indole acetic acid (5-HIAA).

    B) 5HT + monoamine oxidase (MAO) + ADH? => 5-hydroxy-tritofol

    C) 5HT + ariralquilamina-N-acetyltransferase => N-acetilserotonina + indoxi-indol-O-methyltransferase => Melatonin (MT)


Since if we wanted to enhance the path 1-2-3C, we should:

1) Increase or not decrease (TPOH) and (tetrahidrobiopterin)
2) Increase or not decrease (5-Hydroxytryptophan decarboxylase) (B6) and  (B2)  (This last does pridoxina phosphate => pyridoxal phosphate )
3) Reduce the monoamine oxidase (MAO) to prevent catabolization of seroronina (5HT)  to (5-HIAA).

In short, the question is how to raise (or not fall):

1) T-Hydroxylase (TPOH)
2) Tetrahidrobiopterín
3) 5-Hydroxytryptophan decarboxylase
4) (B6) Pyridoxine phosphate
5) (B2) Riboflavin. Causing pyridoxine phosphate => pyridoxal phosphate

And how to fall (or not raise):

6) monoamine oxidase (MAO) to avoid routes 3A and 3B.

So we can begin to explore how to do these 6 things that We could call “actions on pathway serotonin/ melatonin #1 to #6 “

Comments awaited.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
coach_bill
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline


"Dont expect me to lay
down for this"


Posts: 680
x0|euclid|USA||0|0|OH,Ohio
Gender: male
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #29 - Feb 19th, 2009 at 9:20pm
 
Thank you, This is the best post i seen since i have been part of this site. My only question right now is, if sertonin is the main thought process here, how does mushroom stop so many people with clusters, do the mushrooms raise their sertonin levels? i Will be following this post. 


                   Challening, more assertive.. Coach Bill Angry
Back to top
  

boy i cant wait till it's my turn to give him a headache. paybacks a bitch
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gonzalo
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I Love CH.com!


Posts: 43
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #30 - Feb 19th, 2009 at 9:31pm
 
So, Monty

Returning to the melatonin (I know I am recurrent), I agree that it's unsafe to reduce their levels, due to the important role of it at so many levels, but I can not yet directly linked to the CH, only because the the indirect consumption of serotonin.

This is because the times were more prone to crises are precisely the times in which more melatonin is produced. At night and in winter. I've seen charts of annual levels of melatonin (study in France) and are near reversed to those of serotonin. It increases in summer (peak stage) and winter (high peak) and minimum in spring and autumn, more peak for the old people than for youngers. Also the daily maximum is in the dream. It is understood why I can not see a direct melatonin-CH: ¿more melatonie, more crises? ... .

And one last thing. I can not believe that the body does not decrease the production of melatonin after its exogenous intake. I have already related about the person who took years to recover its all-life "well sleeping" when leaving melatonin after consuming it for two years. And we will investigate a little bit in everything.

Un abrazo.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Gonzalo
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I Love CH.com!


Posts: 43
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #31 - Feb 19th, 2009 at 9:34pm
 
coach_bill wrote on Feb 19th, 2009 at 9:20pm:
Thank you, This is the best post i seen since i have been part of this site. My only question right now is, if sertonin is the main thought process here, how does mushroom stop so many people with clusters, do the mushrooms raise their sertonin levels?


WE'll arrive here soon. For the moment i think I've read LSD and Mushrooms have a strong affectation to the serotonin recepeteurs. No much idea at this moment, but I think in this thread we need to pass over nearly all the CH affections, including this one.

Regards
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Gonzalo
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I Love CH.com!


Posts: 43
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #32 - Feb 19th, 2009 at 9:46pm
 
More important, at least as important as the way of tryptophan to serotonin is the road that runs the tryptophan ingested to the brain, facilitating the presence of free tryptophan, tryptophan combined with albumin, which is captured by the pineal (incidentally, the pineal is outside the blood-brain barrier) and improve all these processes.

Then be seen as preventing the tryptophan chooses the path of quinurenina and do to become serotonin.

So the study would have three phases:

1) Study to improve availability of tryptophan

2) Study of inhibition of the pathway quinurenina

3) Study of the enhancement of the serotonin pathway

This done, we can turn to the reuptake, SSRIs, etc. ..

It's right this planning for you???

But with calm, OK? I am making an effort with my time. Pleasant, but one effort.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
ANNSIE
Ex Member



Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #33 - Feb 20th, 2009 at 3:43am
 
Gonzalo wrote on Feb 19th, 2009 at 9:00pm:
First, thanks for the fixing work. Superbe.


Nor do I share other statements, such as the level of serotonin is strictly controlled, and by the hypothalamus. If you want to comment on where you read this, it would be a good contribution to the discussion, because nothing that I've studied so far supports that idea at all.


Salut.



Hi Gonzalo,

I read about serotonin control in this article:

Solms, Mark (2000) DREAMING AND REM SLEEP ARE CONTROLLED BY DIFFERENT BRAIN MECHANISMS,  Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (63)

and from the other articles as quoted in that article.

You may need a subscription or online purchase to be able to access it though.

I have been reading up on pineal gland and REM and nonREM sleep, the bioneurological mechanism of different stages of sleep, not in a CHer but in normal and mentally ill patients. What I read I was surprised to find how much it could be related to CH and the mechanism of CH. However, it is so complicated that it is almost impossible to summarise into an easily understandable presentation.

The level of serotonin and melatonin changes throughout the day and night, according to the circadian rhythm, which in turns is affected both by internal factors such as the hypothalamus and the pineal gland etc , and external factors like the weather, the different seasons etc.

Since personally I am finding it difficult to discern the most important pathway or element, I am hoping that by discussing it with others will make things clearer.

My main interest in to come up with some strong enough evidence that I can present to the specialists at medical conferences to raise their interest, with view to pushing for research. So far, I have not been able to develop a concise enough hypothesis that I can present and defend.

Thanks for helping.

Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
ANNSIE
Ex Member



Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #34 - Feb 20th, 2009 at 4:00am
 
monty wrote on Feb 19th, 2009 at 8:37pm:
Quote:
There is a very strict control of the amount of serotonin in the brain, regulated by the hypothalamus. External factors that affect the overall serotonin level in the body does not have much direct effect on that in the brain.


I don't believe that. It has been shown that a diet low in tryptophan, or lactose or fructose intolerance (which reduces tryptophan absorption) lowers serotonin levels in the blood and is associated with anxiety, depression, and other problems of the nervous system. Because tryptophan must be actively transported into the brain, it is possible that this transmission system can be impaired, or that other amino acids compete with tryptophan and reduce levels.  My worst two years of cluster headaches were when I was living with what (in obvious hindsight now) was an undiagnosed/misdiagnosed fructose intolerance.  Which is not to reduce all clusters to that one theory, merely to accept it may have been an issue for me and some others.




Anxiety and depression have been found to respond to medication that raises serotonin such as SSRI. Therefore it was deduced that potentially low serotonin is the cause of anxiety and depression. However, recent studies have found that SSRIs work not by increasing or stablelising serotonin but through the indirect effects of noradrenaline and dopamine.

In CH, simply making more serotonin available with SSRI does not work.

So far, what I have found is that CH can be brought on by many mechanisms. It involves the circulation, the inflammation process, the trigeminal nerve, the autonomic nervous system and the circadian rhythm. However, the evidences seem to point most strongly towards the autonomic nervous system and the circadian rhythm. The hypothalamus and the pineal glands regulate these two.

What seems to happen in CH is either these two glands malfunction all by themselves ( due to genetic predisposition ) or these two glands malfunction due to an abnormal feedback system caused by abnormal levels of certain neurotransmitters.

This model of pathogenesis has been shown to exist in other conditions which also involve similar organs, pathways and neurotransmitters, such as migraines and some mental disorders.

Diet and lifestyle change have been shown to be helpful in those conditions but not as reliable treatment option. I am not saying that they dont help, its just that the level of improvement is not consistant nor significant enough to be deemed therapeutic.

Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
monty
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 1056
The Swamp, Florida
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #35 - Feb 20th, 2009 at 1:29pm
 
Quote:
Anxiety and depression have been found to respond to medication that raises serotonin such as SSRI. Therefore it was deduced that potentially low serotonin is the cause of anxiety and depression. However, recent studies have found that SSRIs work not by increasing or stablelising serotonin but through the indirect effects of noradrenaline and dopamine.


SSRIs don't raise the actual amount of serotonin in the body; they only increase the effective level of serotonin in certain areas of certain nerves (and as you noted, that may not even be how they work - it may be indirect effects on other things).  So the fact that SSRIs don't usually improve clusters is good to know, but it is limited in scope.

SSRIs have a very different type of action than a MAO inhibitor or a serotonin precursor or and indoleamine deoxygenase inhibitor, all of which can actually raise the level of serotonin.  And the work on lactose/fructose intolerance shows that some individuals with anxiety/depression do respond quite well to increasing the levels of serotonin in the blood - tryptophan is converted to serotonin, but nor/epinephrine and dopamine require the amino acid tyrosine.


Quote:
In CH, simply making more serotonin available with SSRI does not work.


Again, SSRIs do not make more serotonin available everywhere. They make each pulse of serotonin in some nerves more likely to last longer or be more intense - and they do this by blocking the reuptake in certain nerves.  

When low serotonin levels reduce melatonin production, SSRIs do not necessarily change that. (Some SSRIs do, but they do it indirectly by inhibiting other enzymes, and some SSRIs do not affect melatonin at all.)  On the other hand, taking tryptophan or 5-htp has been shown to raise melatonin fairly consistently, especially when serotonin levels were low to start.

Quote:
So far, what I have found is that CH can be brought on by many mechanisms. It involves the circulation, the inflammation process, the trigeminal nerve, the autonomic nervous system and the circadian rhythm. However, the evidences seem to point most strongly towards the autonomic nervous system and the circadian rhythm. The hypothalamus and the pineal glands regulate these two.


Agree fully. I think the hypothalamus/pineal factors and the serotonin/melatonin factors are close to the center of the mechanism, and as such deserve special attention. But other things can destabilize or disturb the system.

Quote:
What seems to happen in CH is either these two glands malfunction all by themselves ( due to genetic predisposition ) or these two glands malfunction due to an abnormal feedback system caused by abnormal levels of certain neurotransmitters.


One curious thing I came across recently was the idea that the pineal gland can get calcified and less responsive. This can happen naturally, but high fluoride levels are also one way this can happen. Three of us here are from the same small town, which was one of the first to fluoridate water.  Coincidence?  Maybe. I'm sure there are other factors - traumatic injury to the head (I also have that), genetic predisposition, poor sleep hygiene, etc. etc.


Quote:
Diet and lifestyle change have been shown to be helpful in those conditions but not as reliable treatment option. I am not saying that they dont help, its just that the level of improvement is not consistant nor significant enough to be deemed therapeutic.


Agree with you on this for the most part.  Lifestyle can be very important, but it is not always a direct or consistent pattern. We know that what works for some won't work for others.  In a sense this is similar to migraines - 'therapeutics' include the triptans and other quick acting medicines, a few preventives, but lifestyle is even more nebulous and harder to predict, so many throw up their hands with respect to lifestyle modifications.  


Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 20th, 2009 at 1:32pm by monty »  

The outer boundary of what we currently believe is feasible is far short of what we actually must do.
 
IP Logged
 
ANNSIE
Ex Member



Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #36 - Feb 20th, 2009 at 3:18pm
 
monty wrote on Feb 20th, 2009 at 1:29pm:
SSRIs don't raise the actual amount of serotonin in the body; they only increase the effective level of serotonin in certain areas of certain nerves (and as you noted, that may not even be how they work - it may be indirect effects on other things).  So the fact that SSRIs don't usually improve clusters is good to know, but it is limited in scope.

SSRIs have a very different type of action than a MAO inhibitor or a serotonin precursor or and indoleamine deoxygenase inhibitor, all of which can actually raise the level of serotonin.  And the work on lactose/fructose intolerance shows that some individuals with anxiety/depression do respond quite well to increasing the levels of serotonin in the blood - tryptophan is converted to serotonin, but nor/epinephrine and dopamine require the amino acid tyrosine.





Monty, you need to go back and read about neurotransmitters and synaptic transmittions again because what you said there is not quite correct. SSRIs does affect the level of serotonin AVAILABLE at the synapses of ALL of the nerves which use serotonin as a neurotransmitter.

MAOI and IDI have a similar effect. They block the breakdown of the precursors of serotonin allowing more to be available at the synapses.

The TOTAL amount of serotonin is regulated by a feedback system controlled by the hypothalamus and/or the pineal gland.

BTW, I am interested in what you have read relating to the work on lactose/fructose intolerance. Would you be able to cite some references for me please ? thank you. I have not yet looked in that direction.

monty wrote on Feb 20th, 2009 at 1:29pm:
Again, SSRIs do not make more serotonin available everywhere. They make each pulse of serotonin in some nerves more likely to last longer or be more intense - and they do this by blocking the reuptake in certain nerves. 




SSRIs make more serotonin available and for longer at EVERY synapse of ALL the nerves that use serotonin as a neurotransmitters. Thats why SSRIs have so many side effects.

Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
monty
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 1056
The Swamp, Florida
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #37 - Feb 20th, 2009 at 4:48pm
 
Here are some links on sugar malabsorption and serotonin and related conditions, along with some other reports that simply consuming more beta-lactalbumin (a milk protein) can increase serotonin levels and improve mood.

Malabsorption of carbohydrates and depression in children and adolescents. PMID: 15861016

Fructose malabsorption is associated with decreased plasma tryptophan.
PMID: 11336160

Fructose- and sorbitol-reduced diet improves mood and gastrointestinal disturbances in fructose malabsorbers.
PMID: 11099057

Dietary carbohydrates: effects on self-selection, plasma glucose and insulin, and brain indoleaminergic systems in rat.
PMID: 7537031

Lactose malabsorption is associated with early signs of mental depression in females: a preliminary report.
PMID: 9824144

Kallikrein and serotonin in the blood of patients with lactose intolerance
PMID: 4407879

Fructose malabsorption is associated with early signs of mental depression.
PMID: 9620891

Dietary influences on neurotransmission.
PMID: 3026151

Alpha-lactalbumin-enriched diets enhance serotonin release and induce anxiolytic and rewarding effects in the rat.
PMID: 14684242

Effect of different tryptophan sources on amino acids availability to the brain and mood in healthy volunteers. PMID: 18648776

Effects of alpha-lactalbumin on emotional processing in healthy women.
PMID: 17446205

Diet rich in alpha-lactalbumin improves memory in unmedicated recovered depressed patients and matched controls.
PMID: 16174675
Back to top
  

The outer boundary of what we currently believe is feasible is far short of what we actually must do.
 
IP Logged
 
monty
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 1056
The Swamp, Florida
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #38 - Feb 20th, 2009 at 5:11pm
 
Quote:
Monty, you need to go back and read about neurotransmitters and synaptic transmittions again because what you said there is not quite correct. SSRIs does affect the level of serotonin AVAILABLE at the synapses of ALL of the nerves which use serotonin as a neurotransmitter.


Ok, lets say that SSRIs work at every single type of nerve anywhere in the body that has serotonin (this isn't true-see below, but lets just say it is true). SSRIs only increase serotonin locally in those spots.

SSRIs do not change the amount of serotonin in the body much (if at all); they make nerve cells more sensitive to it, they increase the effective concentration of it in the synaptic cleft only.  This does not increase the amount of serotonin available for non-neuronal use, or for conversion to melatonin. The MAO inhibitors actually increase blood levels of serotonin,  as do the precursors and the IDO inhibitors. That is an importance difference.

So I don't think we can extrapolate the fact that SSRIs don't seem to do much for clusters to the idea that raising serotonin levels can't possibly be good for clusters, as SSRIs don't really raise total free serotonin. SSRIs are one particular, limited way of changing serotonin activity.



Quote:
The small numbers of serotonergic central neurons of vertebrates and invertebrates produce their effects by use of two modes of secretion: from synaptic terminals, acting locally in hard wired circuits, and from extrasynaptic axonal and somatodendritic release sites in the absence of postsynaptic targets, producing paracrine effects.

Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or Register


The SSRIs do not amplify the effects of serotonin in the second type of receptor. Serotonin is both a neurotransmitter, paracrine hormone, and precursor of melatonin and other things.  SSRIs only affect serotonin levels in the synaptic terminals or clefts.

Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 20th, 2009 at 5:34pm by monty »  

The outer boundary of what we currently believe is feasible is far short of what we actually must do.
 
IP Logged
 
ANNSIE
Ex Member



Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #39 - Feb 20th, 2009 at 9:49pm
 

Hi Monty,

Thank you very much for the articles on lactose/fructose intolerance, I will read up on them.  Smiley

Regarding the second article, it discussed the role of serotonin in general in application to vertebrates and invertebrates' behaviours, more specifically leech. I am talking about the finding of the effects of SSRIs in human.

Anyway, I think we are getting a bit side tracked. The original posts discuss the hypothesis that by modifying serotonin, via diet changes, that we might see an improvement in CH. My point is from what I have learnt about the mechanisms possibly involved in the genesis of CH, it is not the central point. I believe that the key point is the control pathways via feedback system by which the hypothamalamus and the pineal gland maintaining homeostasis for the body. CH seems to be the byproduct of the break down of such. I feel that the key to unravel how and where and why the break down occurs is the functions of the autonomic nervous system, and therefore the "cure" most possibly lies here.

So far, the only chemicals that seem to have the power to completely halt CH in its track are those that have a profound effects on the autonomic nervous system, namely ergotamine and its derivatives.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Gonzalo
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I Love CH.com!


Posts: 43
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #40 - Feb 21st, 2009 at 12:12am
 
Quote:
Anyway, I think we are getting a bit side tracked

Do not know how I liked reading this. That's what I was looking.

Quote:
The original posts discuss the hypothesis that by modifying serotonin, via diet changes, that we might see an improvement in CH

No, no. The original hypothesis has the diet, if that becomes available to discuss it, as a fraction of a more comprehensive plan of action. I just start with it in the next message.

Quote:
My point is from what I have learnt about the mechanisms possibly involved in the genesis of CH, it is not the central point. I believe that the key point is the control pathways via feedback system by which the hypothamalamus and the pineal gland maintaining homeostasis for the body. CH seems to be the byproduct of the break down of such. I feel that the key to unravel how and where and why the break down occurs is the functions of the autonomic nervous system, and therefore the "cure" most possibly lies here.

Naturally there may be an indefinite number of hypotheses on the CH. But I have explained one, and hypotheses assumptions should not be demonstrated, so they are called hypotheses, they are accepted 'a priori' and they are discussed to find where they lead. I think it would be interesting to develop your hypothese at other topic in parallel, so that people could participate in this one and/or others, it will always be very interesting for all us.

Regards.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Gonzalo
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I Love CH.com!


Posts: 43
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #41 - Feb 21st, 2009 at 12:14am
 
Well, let's get organized and we are in order. I proposed three points relating to the possible increase of serotonin, as I said in the conclusions (2) of my first post of the approach hypothesis. The three points are:

a) Increase the availability of tryptophan
b) Avoid the path of conversion of tryptophan quinurenina
c) To facilitate the conversion of tryptophan to serotonin

With your permission, I would like to initiate discussion on item (a).

Years ago, this was my starting point in my studies and I do not remember in detail all aspects related to this issue, so I write what I remember, I would incur in a multitude of mistakes and I would appreciate your corrections.

Necessarily ingested tryptophan in the diet, that's a fact. Most of the tryptophan consumed remains in the intestine, but a small fraction is able to pass to the blood flow (tryptophan-free call) and a part of it can enter the brain.

Recall that the brain serotonin must to be produced in the brain itself, since it does not cross the blood-brain barrier, so it is vital that tryptophan reaches the brain. To do this, it need a transport, but to gain such transport it must compete with other amino acids "neutral" who have greater capacity to transport than him (tyrosine, phenylalanine, leucine, isoleucine and valine)

Although the pineal gland is outside the blood-brain berrera, it captures only tryptophan combined with albumin against the blood circulation, so the transport remains essential. At least two chemicals help tryptophan to join transport over the other amino acids: insulin and carbohydrate.

Nor should we forget that an excess of tryptophan automatically produces an elevation of T-pirrolasa leading tryptophan to the quinurenina, and since this is a self-regulatory body, does not seem much less desirable exceeding consumption. A normal diet (Western) provides more than enough tryptophan to meet the needs of the organism.

With all that, I theorize some mechanisms to increase the general availability of free tryptophan and brain

1) Do not ingest external tryptophan, at least not in high doses, the effect would be contrary to that sought. When the ingestion of Tryptophan is prescribed, it start at high doses, which decreases over time and stages of abstinence in order to avoid this possible effect.
2) Improve the diet for the tryptophan ingested substances is accompanied by to help you reach the brain, eat something sweet and / or carbohydrate (potatoes, bread, ..)
3) Check that the tryptophan is not eated with a large number of amino acid competitors. In this sense, red meat (cow, pig, etc.). have a lot of tryptophan, but also large amounts of other amino acids. Foods that have tryptophan with less competitors and even transport facilitators are: bananas, turkey meat, whole grains, milk and eggs.
4) Make the ingestion of these foods preferably separated from other ingestions.

Recalling that the excess is counterproductive, and that the availability of brain tryptophan occurs in one or two hours after ingestion, I propose as a first good idea to eat some turkey meat and potatoes, or a turkey sandwich with whole grain cereals, or a banana for dessert. Any of these things looking to do a couple of hours before the scheduled time for the crisis.

Probably, this is not the way to get a significant improvement, much less, but could be a condition “sine qua non" for the points b) and c) can be met.

I do not forget the possible ingestion of 5-HTTP or other issues, but I prefer to concentrate on this first point the mere availability of tryptophan.

I look forward to corrections, comments or ideas.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
GrandPotentate
CH.com Old Timer
****
Offline


mmmmmmmmmm


Posts: 254
Michigan City, IN  USA
Gender: male
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #42 - Feb 21st, 2009 at 9:28am
 
Wow.  I struggled to get through college chem.  And I spent too much time in biology focused on my lab partner's (and she on mine).

I really appreciate that this discussion is going on.  Please keep up the good work!
Back to top
  

Jon
 
IP Logged
 
coach_bill
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline


"Dont expect me to lay
down for this"


Posts: 680
x0|euclid|USA||0|0|OH,Ohio
Gender: male
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #43 - Feb 21st, 2009 at 3:13pm
 
      I dont beleive diet can improve CH, Wouldnt this thought have something in line with how we draw "triggers" from certain foods Some people eat candy bar and get CH, Same as smells draw CH.

       Im not understanding the differance of sertonin, and free sertonin, I believe it is in the transmission, and the sertonin and the mushroom chem break down are almost exatlly the same. I know im not that smart and i dont really understand all this but here it is.

     I never got a cycle that started any other time but in the fall, Always after the time change. So something in the brain is sending out cells that lack sertonin and on path back up if they dont have the proper sertonin.. CH.  This is where the mushroom chem breakdown comes into play and fools returning cell into beleive that it is corrected, Because the cem make-up is almost identical.

    So if you can trick the brain with the LSD on returning cells, So dont that mean the problem starts in the cemical make-up of the cells themselfs. I hope this dont sound stupid.


                                Challening, More assertive.. Coach Bill  Angry
Back to top
  

boy i cant wait till it's my turn to give him a headache. paybacks a bitch
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Gonzalo
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I Love CH.com!


Posts: 43
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #44 - Feb 21st, 2009 at 9:47pm
 
coach_bill wrote on Feb 21st, 2009 at 3:13pm:
I dont beleive diet can improve CH

Nor do I believe that a diet may improve CH, especially because, as I said, a normal Western diet provides more than enough tryptophan to meet our needs. If I touched the subject, it was due to three reasons: first, because it is logical to do the study fairly complete, second, because although a vast majority of us do not have any problem at that level, there is always someone that can have, and thirdly, because it is shown that an adequate intake of tryptophan produces really immediate rises in the levels of serotonin (talking about one/two hours), so in an emergency, some of the things I mention could hopefully raise levels, not to avoid crisis, but making it more bearable. I do not tire of repeating that all these things work hours to view, not days, so they can be useful used just before the crisis, not as daily therapy.

coach_bill wrote on Feb 21st, 2009 at 3:13pm:
 Im not understanding the differance of sertonin, and free sertonin

In simple terms, 90% of serotonin is synthesized in the intestine, and there it is. From the remaining 10%, 8% is captured, stored and transported, particularly by platelets. The rest is free for use by neurons. If the binding potential of transport increases, such in autumn and winter, is rest less free serotonin because it’s captured by platelets. SSRI’s have so much affinity for the transport of serotonin and occupy their site by removing it from these receptors and allowing more free serotonin.

coach_bill wrote on Feb 21st, 2009 at 3:13pm:
I never got a cycle that started any other time but in the fall, Always after the time change. So something in the brain is sending out cells that lack sertonin and on path back up if they dont have the proper sertonin.. CH.  This is where the mushroom chem breakdown comes into play and fools returning cell into beleive that it is corrected, Because the cem make-up is almost identical.
So if you can trick the brain with the LSD on returning cells, So dont that mean the problem starts in the cemical make-up of the cells themselfs


The human being is subjected to a genetic system to 50,000 years old. Only 3,000 years ago we learned to plant, grow and raise livestock, and only a hundred years ago this food is packaged and transported. It has nothing to do our current food with the diet 30,000 years ago. And not only for what we eat, but by the quality, methods of preparation, etc ... Should we take for granted that our body still has not adapted to our new way of life, or our stimuli, or almost nothing. Therefore it is very difficult to find a direct cause of how chemicals affect CH, or anything else, perhaps because they are not direct but indirect and complex because of all these important changes. I also believe that problem is not in the cells themselves but in the circumstances that the body promotes at different seasons (that it want us to do, hibernating, migrating, or changing dietary habits, or God knows what he wants) and it no longer makes sense to us and, of course, we do not.

Regards.
Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
Gonzalo
CH.com Junior
**
Offline


I Love CH.com!


Posts: 43
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #45 - Feb 21st, 2009 at 9:53pm
 
Mechanism of action of drugs.

To not reject a hypothesis, it should at least explain the common observed facts. So little by little I’ll try to present a minimal explanation of how the various drugs that are prescribed for the CH operate.

Ergotamine.

Ergotamin does not deserve much discussion. Its action is predominantly vasoconstrictive, and very powerful. So much so, that combined with other vasoconstricting as triptans, may be fatal.

Ergotamin causes significant vasoconstriction throughout the body, so it would be classified in my first group of hypotheses, the idea of preventing inflammation of the nerve.

I must say that I have consulted some doctors that asked surprised if it’s still prescribed today. The first option seems to be the triptans, the ergot is full of contra-indications, warnings, etc. ..

As a general warning, in addition to substances that are contraindicated with ergot, a leaflet that lacks information: cocaine. Powerful vasoconstrictor, has already resulted in limb amputations in patients due to lack of blood flow. Remember: if you take ergotamine, do not to consume cocaine.

I’ll gradually try to address all drugs and substances as well known by us. Of course, some help would be welcome  Smiley

Back to top
  
 
IP Logged
 
monty
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 1056
The Swamp, Florida
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #46 - Feb 22nd, 2009 at 1:25pm
 
Gonzalo wrote on Feb 21st, 2009 at 12:14am:
3) Check that the tryptophan is not eated with a large number of amino acid competitors. In this sense, red meat (cow, pig, etc.). have a lot of tryptophan, but also large amounts of other amino acids. Foods that have tryptophan with less competitors and even transport facilitators are: bananas, turkey meat, whole grains, milk and eggs.


Ok - some better foods include sesame seed and sunflower seed, if we look at the percent of Tryptophan as compared to the amount of Large Neutral Amino Acids (LNAA).  The LNAA compete with each other for transport into the brain, and include Tryptophan, Isoleucine, Leucine, Valine and Tyrosine.

According to my calculations (time limited, will do more later), these foods have the following % of Tryptophan compared to total LNAA (higher is better):

Sesame seed flour: 9.17
Sunflower seed: 6.79
Banana: 5.57
Coconut water: 5.12
Turkey breast: 4.81

One thing to consider is that sesame and sunflower and coconut are also high in the arginine:lysine ratio, so it may increase nitric oxide levels. I don't know if that would trigger the way that nitrogylcerine does, probably not, but it is possible.  I have had low hdl in the past, and arginine is generally good for increasing hdl and reducing heart risk factors. So I try to drink coconut water and eat sunflower seeds and tahini sesame paste more often. But if I went into cycle, I would have to consider if it might be good to temporarily reduce arginine levels. (Low niacin is also associated with low hdl, and niacin supplements are a good way to increase hdl).

I got the amino acid profiles from Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or Register - they have tables that are mostly from the US Dept of Agriculture.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 22nd, 2009 at 1:40pm by monty »  

The outer boundary of what we currently believe is feasible is far short of what we actually must do.
 
IP Logged
 
monty
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 1056
The Swamp, Florida
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #47 - Feb 22nd, 2009 at 3:23pm
 
Ok, a longer list of tryptophan as a percent of LNAA:

Sesame seed flour,  9.17
Wheat flour, whole grain, 7.94
Potato, baked, flesh and skin, 7.48
Cocoa powder, unsweetened, 7.05
Quinoa, uncooked, 7.04
Wheat flour, white, 13% protein, 6.99
Oyster mushroom, raw, 6.96
Tofu, made with nigari, 6.92
Amaranth grain, uncooked, 6.82
Sunflower seeds, 6.79
Whey milk protein, sweet, dried, 6.46
Pumpkin seed (pepitas), 6.37
Shrimp, mixed species, cooked moist heat, 6.25
Soybeans, mature seeds, boiled, 6.25
Pistachio nuts, roasted, salted,  6.23
Peanut butter, smooth, no salt, 5.78
Banana, 5.57
Rice, brown, long grained, cooked, 5.49
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, stewed, 5.25
Lamb, trimmed retail cuts, cooked, 5.18
Coconut water, 5.12
Dates, Medjool, 5.12  
Egg, whole, omlet,  5.08
Cod, broiled, 5.01
Salmon, broiled, 5.01
Beans, baked, canned, plain, 4.81
Turkey Breast, 4.81
Milk, skim, 4.73
Bologna, Pork, 4.66
Corn flour, whole grain yellow, 2.75
Ground Beef, 80% lean, 2.26
Yogurt, plain, skim milk,      1.9

Thoughts:  

1) Don't eat crunchy beef tacos!  Corn and beef are very low in tryptophan compared to other LNAAs, and a diet heavy in either of these could reduce the amount of serotonin that can formed in the brain. Lamb is a better red meat with respect to tryptophan (and in many other ways, IMO).

2) Turkey is over-rated when it comes to tryptophan. It is equal to baked beans, less than chicken and many other foods. Actually calculating which foods have the best ratio gives a rather different list than is spread in the urban legends and oral traditions.  I have long said that the Thanksgiving drowsiness is due to eating way too much, not to the amount of tryptophan in turkey. I have taken a large dose of pure tryptophan on an empty stomach, and it has never made me feel like I feel after stuffing myself on Thanksgiving day.

3) A desert dessert concoction of dates, sesame paste, pistachios, sunflower seeds, and maybe a little chocolate and honey could be good - Halva is pretty popular across the Mediterranean ... it is based on ground sesame seeds, and sometimes contains some of the other things I mentioned.  Dates have a good ratio of tryptophan, but the total amount is low ... but they are sweet and tasty, so could be a good mix.

4) Wheat is better than rice, whole wheat is better than white refined wheat. All of these are better than most meats if the goal is to raise brain tryptophan/serotonin.

5) Milk is not that great of a source of tryptophan, but one particular protein in milk (alpha-lactalbumin) is much better. Some of the research on the effects of diet and neurotransmitters uses a purified form of this protein. So far, I haven't found a supplement that is pure alpha-lactalbumin, except when buying in huge volume (1000 kg dried). Whey protein (which is used by many in bodybuilding) is better than normal milk. Yogurt may be good for many reasons, but tryptophan is not one of them.

Foods that are high in protein can overwhelm those that are are medium or low protein. For example, combining four ounces of beef with 4 ounces of wheat bread would not be the average of the two... not ((7.94+2.26)/2) or 5.1.  Since the meat has about 3 -4 times more protein than bread per ounce, the true weighted average for a hamburger would be down around 3.4 to 3.7, which is still quite low. A quarter pounder lambburger would weigh in around 5.8, which is considerably better.  

A stir-fry dish with shrimp, tofu, wheat noodles and a good dash of ground sesame would be above 7 -- twice as much brain-available tryptophan as a hamburger.  

More reasonable over the long term - if someone's diet had a weighted average of 4-5, and they raised it to a 6, that could translate to a 20% to 50% increase in the tryptophan available to the brain. I've run some sample diets, and think that a 20-25% increase is possible without banning or prohibiting any foods, simply eating less of the foods on the low end, more on the high end.

This could actually be done consuming the same amount of tryptophan, so I don't think the enzymes to degrade tryptophan would go up, unless they are controlled by the balance of LNAA instead of the amount of tryptophan.

Because the mechanism for transporting LNAA to the brain is relatively slow and gets saturated, the timing of the food may be important as Gonazalo previously said. Eating foods with a high score first (morning meal, pre-meal (soup/salad) and snacks/empty stomach) could make a difference.



Back to top
« Last Edit: Feb 22nd, 2009 at 9:01pm by monty »  

The outer boundary of what we currently believe is feasible is far short of what we actually must do.
 
IP Logged
 
Pixie-elf
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline


I've tried the rest, and
busting is the best!


Posts: 517
Beaumont,Tx
Gender: female
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #48 - Feb 22nd, 2009 at 11:24pm
 
First of all, nice job Golanzo, I don't think your translation was awful at all. I understood it pretty well.

Second, there's a thread on here titled Why don't we pay attention to this? It's referring specifically to how testosterone imbalance can effect CH. You might want to read it... I don't know if testosterone has any effect on serotonin, but it might be something to look at.

I can't remember if there are any other threads mentioning other forms of imbalances, at the moment...

monty wrote on Feb 18th, 2009 at 10:58am:
Ok - a few other possible therapies.

At least 2 probiotic bacteria (Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Bifidobacterium longum) reduce tryptophan pyrrolase activity in the gut.

Shiitake mushroom stimulates Bifidobacteria breve and Lactobacillus brevis, and leads to reduced levels of tryptophanase in the gut. PMID: 18982487

Curcumin (turmeric) decreases conversion of serotonin to 5-HIAA (MAO inhibitor?) Curcumin also has beneficial effects on the balance of 5-ht1 and 5-ht2 receptors (stimulates -1 and inhibits -2). For a variety of other reasons, curcumin seems like a potential good treatment. Am working on a longer write-up of curcumin, but will throw it out here.

"Excessive doses of retinol (vitamin A) reduces liver t-pyrrolase ... not sure how toxic these 'excessive' levels are.  PMID 17942093.

Will keep sifting through the list to see what else might be significant.  


Random Fact! High amounts of vitamin A also can cause increased intracranial hypertension. (I had this, though, not due to getting too much vitamin A.) Avoid eating polar bear livers. Wink

PFDAN

Mystina
Back to top
  

As far as I'm concerned, cluster busting has been the best treatment I've tried. No migraines since I started it, and my hits have gotten so much better. Wanna know more?
Multimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or Register

It's saved my life.
 
IP Logged
 
monty
CH.com Hall of Famer
*****
Offline




Posts: 1056
The Swamp, Florida
Re: One CH hypothesis, presentation and discussion
Reply #49 - Feb 23rd, 2009 at 9:34am
 
No doubt, vitamin A can be toxic at certain doses. I am wondering what the original article meant by 'excessive' - it could be that anything over 100% of the daily allowance might be considered excessive. Doubling or tripling or quadrupling that for a short time would have little toxicity, not sure if that would be enough to reduce the tryptophanase activity for a cycle.

I think a diet limited to polar bear liver has 100,000x the daily allowance - that gets toxic quick.

Back to top
  

The outer boundary of what we currently believe is feasible is far short of what we actually must do.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 
Send Topic Print

DISCLAIMER: All information contained on this web site is for informational purposes only.  It is in no way intended to be used as a replacement for professional medical treatment.   clusterheadaches.com makes no claims as to the scientific/clinical validity of the information on this site OR to that of the information linked to from this site.  All information taken from the internet should be discussed with a medical professional!