New CH.com Forum
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl
Cluster Headache Help and Support >> Medications,  Treatments,  Therapies >> Reliability of new drug claims?
http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1315501806

Message started by George on Sep 8th, 2011 at 1:10pm

Title: Reliability of new drug claims?
Post by George on Sep 8th, 2011 at 1:10pm
START PRINTPAGEMultimedia File Viewing and Clickable Links are available for Registered Members only!!  You need to Login or RegisterEND PRINTPAGE

I wouldn't give this as much credence if it hadn't come from the journal, "Nature". 

Best,

George

Title: Re: Reliability of new drug claims?
Post by Ricardo on Sep 29th, 2011 at 1:51pm
Reminds me of how they used to say that Methadone was a non addictive opiate...Actually, they said that about heroin, tramadol, and oxycontin when they came out too... :)

Title: Re: Reliability of new drug claims?
Post by Bob Johnson on Sep 29th, 2011 at 4:33pm
CONSUMER REPORTS suggests not buying a new model car during the first year. Until the consumer has been racking up miles the full range of strengths/weaknesses/production problems won't be known.

Same is true with new meds. Even with a pure heart, a manufacturer's clinical trails leading up to licensing are rather limited in terms of # of users, interaction with other meds and disorders, etc.

So, if it's not some really magic bullet you need, waiting a couple of years, at least, will give time for more data to accumulate about effectiveness, side effects, interactions, etc.

Anyway, some understanding of the process of licensing meds is more useful and less painful compared to reflexive paranoia <bg>.

New CH.com Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.4!
YaBB © 2000-2009. All Rights Reserved.