|
||||||||||
Title: Functional Hypoxia Post by floridian on Jan 18th, 2007, 8:50pm People here are savvy to the beneficial effects of 100% oxygen, and to the ability of low oxygen levels to trigger a cluster in many people (REM sleep, apnea, high altitude airplanes, etc). Just came across the idea of functional hypoxia - where oxygen goes in through the lungs, is carried around the bodies, but is not used by the cells. Tissues are gasping for O2 when it is all around them. This also crosses over with the research on mitochondria and energy deficits in people with CH and migraine - we know something is sluggish in our mitochondria, and that (at least in migraneurs) things like B-vitamins and CoQ10 can both reduce headaches and reduce the energy deficit. Got me wondering how many people here have this functional hypoxia going on inside, and whether it is a major contributor to CH and a host of other conditions that seem to be common here. If this idea interests you, check out a series of podcasts from the A4M (American Academy for Anti-Aging Medicine, a board certifying group for doctors). These podcasts are available on iTunes for free, and you don't need an iPod to download them - just the iTunes software (which is also free and runs on any Windows or Mac computer with a sound card). |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by tanner on Jan 18th, 2007, 10:10pm My ex- boss Dr Robert Springborn, double PHDs from MIT & Penn etc. a very smart but hard to get along with type was very big on the enzyme that you mention Flo, but never told me exactly why. I know that he belongs to and supports research groups on anti-ageing. Unfortunately like a lot of Mega rich people he never really listened to what any one else was saying unless it was about him so I never was able to pick his brain on the subject. Oh and he also had the attitude that a "headache" was a sign of weakness and didn't even care to hear about Clusters! "Just do the job and quit whining or find something else to do for a living" Real sweetheart ::) I would love to know more about what he seemed to think was a "fountain of youth" supplement from someone other then the folks marketing it. Flo, your up ;)......Tim |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by redhead on Jan 18th, 2007, 10:18pm Floridian, you truly are my hero. Am interested in your new test theory. Is there also a link here with hypoxia and the need for more water as well as O2?? I wonder because water seems to have some connection with getting O2 used in our bodies. What do you think?? |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by floridian on Jan 18th, 2007, 10:35pm I suspect that the water-water-water treatment probably flushes out chloride and other ions, which could make nerves less excitable. But not sure on that one. With functional hypoxia, there is plenty of oxygen in the blood, even in most of the cells, but it doesn't get into the tiny mitochondria for some reason - probably related to transport proteins or cell membranes. Pure 100% oxygen could be boosting the levels in the blood enough to push it into the mitochondria in spite of the reduced transport. But oxygen may work (partially or wholly) through other ways - like vasoconstriction. |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by georgej on Jan 19th, 2007, 12:12am Interesting. on 01/18/07 at 20:50:15, floridian wrote:
Will be interested to look at the mitochondrial research--if there were something going on in the mitochondrial DNA, then CH that is inherited should come down through the female line. Anecdotally, at least, that doesn't seem to be the case, although it seems that CH may be weakly inherited from either parent. Perhaps there is something external to the mitochondria affecting its action, or perhaps there needs to be a combination of factors in place before an effect on the mitochondria is noticeable. Jonathon, can you list a few citations on this so I can read them? Thank you. Best wishes, George |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by floridian on Jan 19th, 2007, 8:42am George, true that mitochondrial DNA is inherited in a mother-only fashion. But the total function of mitochondria can be affected by traditional XX/XY genetics, nutrition, etc. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by floridian on Jan 19th, 2007, 9:15am Kudzu and the mitochondria? Sure. Can't tell if this is how its work vs. the serotonin thing, or if the two are linked and it is certain serotonin changes that affect the mitochondria. Quote:
|
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by BB on Jan 19th, 2007, 10:29am Very interesting Flo. My question is, if the abnormality is at mitochondrial level, why doesnt the same functional hypoxia not triggering a CH hit when a person is out of cycle? Annette |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by floridian on Jan 19th, 2007, 10:43am on 01/19/07 at 10:29:51, BB wrote:
That is the $64,000 question - does it turn on or become worse in cycle, and why? Or is it always there, making us more susceptible, but something else triggers? |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by BB on Jan 19th, 2007, 11:09am Another question is mitochondrial DNA and its functions deteriorate naturally with age, yet CH prevalence peaks at a young age ( most commonly starts before 30 ) and actually gets better with age. CH is rare after age 70 and tends to get less severe and less frequent with age instead of the other way round. Functional hypoxia is also more common in an older person than a younger person, due to various respiratory diseases and with natural aging of body cells. Therefore if the theory is correct that mitochondrial dysfunction and functional hypoxia is a major factor in triggering CH then shouldnt we see more CH and particularly worsening CH in older people? [smiley=huh.gif] [smiley=huh.gif] [smiley=huh.gif] Annette |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by floridian on Jan 19th, 2007, 12:41pm Good questions - logical, and I don't know the answers. Just thinking out loud ... while mitochondrial issues do tend to be more common with increasing age, could it be that they occur earlier in clusterheads and then plateau? And with age, something else burns out, and when that goes, the clusters are less likely? Menopause might be another analogy that gives insight - hormone levels are high. Then at menopause they drop while sometimes fluctuating rapidly, and eventually stabilize at a lower level in post-menopause. During the drop, which can last several years or a decade, the neurovascular symptoms are at their worst (hot flashes, sudden emotional instability, depression etc). When the drop is over, the body eventually adjusts, and those symptoms tend to subside. So it isn't the absolute levels that cause the most visible symptoms, it is the fact that the levels are changing. Of course, the low hormone levels of old age can increase the risk of problems from osteoporosis to alzheimers to heart disease. But hot flashes are less common in very old women, who have hormone levels even lower than menopausal women. |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by nani on Jan 20th, 2007, 10:26am This is fascinating (and way over my head, LOL). It caught my attention because at the time of my emphysema diagnosis, the dr said I was hypoxic, and my lungs are really large because of it. My SATs were 98, though. The diagnosis took me by surprise since I really don't have symptoms. The only reason I got an x-ray was because I'm involved in a genetic lung cancer study and every 18 months I go in for blood work and breathing tests. Prior to the last one in Sept, I was still breathing better than people who've never smoked. I tanked on the last one. I have no clue whether this theory applies to me, LOL...but I thought I'd mention it. |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by Charlotte on Jan 20th, 2007, 12:45pm on 01/19/07 at 11:09:52, BB wrote:
What are you quoting, where did you get this information? I don't want to discourage anyone, but I don't agree. Charlotte |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by kayarr on Jan 20th, 2007, 11:01pm What if the lack of oxygen is more critical in a younger person because of more activity? It may make one of the manifestations clusterheadache if there are other variables present. always thinking;) |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by floridian on Jan 21st, 2007, 12:10am on 01/20/07 at 12:45:48, Charlotte wrote:
It certainly is not an absolute truth, but there is a perception among some researchers that cluster headache is most common among young to middle-aged men. Of course, women get them, and not everyone has a reduction with age. But as a general pattern? Some evidence for that. This Swedish study found that a significant group of patients had only one bout with the beast, and most people seem to have CH for only 3 years or less. Which shifts the statistics towards the idea that clusters get less common with age. Not reflective of what is said here - but it wouldn't be surprising if the regulars here are disprortionately those who get hit more. Quote:
Quote:
This article from Norway might suggest the opposite - if the median age is 47, then half the patients are under 47 and half are older. Which doesn't describe the shape of the curve (which would have to be adjusted to population numbers in each group). Quote:
And those wild and crazy Italians are trying to split CH into two separate subtypes, which have different ages of onset and durations. Quote:
One article suggested that age of onset was rarely lower than 14 (hormones, any one?) |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by BB on Jan 21st, 2007, 1:52am Hi Charlotte, I am not sure I understand your question, what is it that you disagree with? is it the fact that mitochondrial DNA degenerates with age or that CH tends to decrease with age? Annette |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by Charlotte on Jan 21st, 2007, 1:34pm Thank you for the articles, Annette. I disagree that ch decreases with age. Physically, it is worse. Psychologically, it is better. I have words to describe what is happening, herbs and meds to lessen the intensity, and a fantastic support group. Charlotte |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by BB on Jan 21st, 2007, 9:38pm Hi Charlotte, I guess we are talking about a different time frame here when we say "age". By age, I mean older than 70. It is common knowledge reading most general articles and text books on cluster headaches that the most common age for cluster to start is between 20 and 40. The frequency of the attacks and possibly the intensity of the attacks tend to decrease with age once the person is near the 70 years mark. This is a generalisation and of course there are people whose CH would behave differently. However, it is not common to see full blown active CH in people older than 70. In general, DNA and mitochondrial DNA degenerate with age, especially from 50 years onwards. Annette |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by Pinkfloyd on Jan 22nd, 2007, 1:47am on 01/21/07 at 21:38:57, BB wrote:
A recent Norwegian study showed that 41% of male heavy smokers were dead by 70 In the US, the average male life span, is now about 75 Smoking takes off an average of 13 years. (you too ladies) Maybe the reason it's not common to see people getting "full blown clusters" after the age of 70, is because it's not common to see a "cluster sufferer" LIVE past 70. Bobw |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by BB on Jan 22nd, 2007, 2:29am on 01/22/07 at 01:47:10, Pinkfloyd wrote:
OK, thats it everyone ! Stop smoking NOW ! :P 8) First hurdle : convincing my own husband to stop the ciggy ... ::) Annette |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by floridian on Jan 22nd, 2007, 8:19am on 01/21/07 at 21:38:57, BB wrote:
That traditionally has been true, for the population as a whole. But it may not describe people with all genetic constitutions, or what happens when diet and lifestyle/environmental factors change. The 'adult onset' diabetes that used to kick in at age 50+ has shifted to a much younger population. An alarming number of children now have it. Quote:
|
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by georgej on Jan 22nd, 2007, 8:42am on 01/22/07 at 08:19:58, floridian wrote:
An entirely different, but very interesting topic as well (I'm really getting off topic, I'm afraid)--the changes in disease patterns over time for reasons that are not immediately clear. For example, the incidence of rheumatoid arthritis is generally declining in all age groups--drastically. I haven't read a well-defined idea why that might be. Best, George |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by floridian on Jan 22nd, 2007, 9:32am Speaking of decreasing incidence, how bout them Minnesotans?? An 80% reduction in CH over a 10 year period?? Quote:
|
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by bejeeber on Jan 23rd, 2007, 12:48am on 01/21/07 at 13:34:32, Charlotte wrote:
Well in my case, after 25 years or so, it has decreased with age. The cycles have decreased in frequency absolutely. Looking forward to complete burnout. ALthough as far as severity... yeah that got worse, but I'm thinking that's probably courtesy of the meds..... |
||||||||||
Title: Re: Functional Hypoxia Post by mcf69 on Jan 25th, 2007, 4:29pm Very interesting stuff Flo, I've studied functional hypoxia a little bit in A&P class, but have forgot most of it. I'll have to study back up on it and get back to you..... |
||||||||||
Clusterheadaches.com Message Board » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.1! YaBB © 2000-2003. All Rights Reserved. |