Clusterheadaches.com Message Board
        (http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi)
      

        New Message Board Archives >> 2006 General Board Posts >> political thread
        
(Message started by: maffumatt on Sep 10th, 2006, 11:33am)
Title: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 10th, 2006, 11:33am
Is ABC going to edit out the parts of the 911 mini series that Mr Bill wants them to? It's not exactly the legacy that he wanted is it?
Title: Re: political thread
Post by BMoneeTheMoneeMan on Sep 10th, 2006, 11:42am
ABC has openly admitted this docu-drama is fiction.  They arent even trying to play it off as factual.

I find it hard enough to swallow a documentary about such an emotional subject, but I find it offensive that someone would take 9/11 and use it as a political tool based on fiction.

Course, I am getting used to it.   :-/

B$
Title: Re: political thread
Post by ivanov on Sep 10th, 2006, 11:59am
Here is the scoop on the ABC 's Right Wing Drama--

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-blumenthal/discover-the-secret-right_b_29015.html
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Charlie on Sep 10th, 2006, 12:13pm
As someone said: "Seriously, what possible need is there to fictionalize this thing? No one could write something so wild."

Charlie
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Jonny on Sep 10th, 2006, 4:55pm
US Navy welcomes the USS Bill Clinton

Sunday, July 2, 2006, Vancouver BC,  headed for Seattle, WA.
The US Navy welcomed the latest member of its fleet today.

http://im1.shutterfly.com/procserv/47b6d731b3127cce8d4bffbf2f0000000016108AZM2bNk5bM6

Pictured above:   The USS William Jefferson Clinton (CVS1) set sail today from its home port of Vancouver, BC.

The ship is the first of its kind in the Navy and is a standing legacy to President Bill Clinton "for his foresight in military budget cuts" and his conduct while president.  The ship is constructed nearly entirely from recycled aluminum and is completely solar powered with a top speed of 5 knots. It boasts an arsenal comprised of one (unarmed) F14 Tomcat or one (unarmed) F18 Hornet aircraft which although they cannot be launched or captured on the 100 foot flight deck but form a very menacing presence.

As a standing order there are no firearms allowed on board. The 20 person crew is completely diversified and includes members of all races, creeds, sex, and sexual orientation. This crew, like the crew aboard the USS Jimmy Carter, is specially trained to avoid conflicts and appease any and all enemies of the United States at all costs.

An on board Type One DNC Universal Translator can send out messages of apology in any language to anyone who may find America offensive. The number of apologies are limitless and though some may sound hollow and disingenuous, the Navy advises all apologies will sound very sincere.

The ship's purpose is not defined so much as a unit of national defense - but instead in times of conflict the USS Clinton has orders to seek refuge in Canada. The ship may be positioned near the Democratic National Party Headquarters for photo-ops and can be used extensively for social experimentation, and whatever other worthless jobs, the ex-commander-in-chief and his wife can think of.

It is largely rumored that the ship will also be the set for the upcoming season of MTV's "The Real World".
The ship was renamed and commissioned USS William J Clinton when someone realized the USS Blowfish was already taken ;;D
Title: Re: political thread
Post by PL259 on Sep 10th, 2006, 5:07pm
[smiley=bow.gif]
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 7:57am
I was wondering who would follow the party line without even seeing the show.  ::)
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Ghost on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:43am
no truth there .... not like the complete factual Ferenhype 911. I think the should show it as planned and let the people decide. IMHO

Mike
Title: Re: political thread
Post by seasonalboomer on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:55am
if truth is stranger than fiction, then this show is probably not all that far from what went down. i watched it and it corresponds pretty closely with what the 9/11 commission reports seemed to describe. anyone elese actually watch it? anyone else actually read it?
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 9:03am
yeah I did, you can see the deleted scenes on utube if you wish. In the guys last film, the hero was a black communist in the thirtys I believe, then the Reagon movie, funny how he has become a right wing nutjob when before he was a leftist nutjob. Cyrus Nowrasteh do a little research on him.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Kevin_M on Sep 11th, 2006, 9:32am
Living in Detroit, I've watched Canadian TV all my life for objective views that may include American events when they run them.  Last night they ran "The Secret History of 9/11", a minute by minute account of Sept 11, 2001.  Fact based and totally non-political, it  coincided well with a portion of what I've read of pre-9/11 for a show of 3 hours, which included the toxic legacy to it afterwards from the debri.  Many of the interesting things that were revealed while the act was taking place and afterwards was an eye-opener.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by vig on Sep 11th, 2006, 9:39am
I'm an American, not a Republican or a Democrat.

I don't like political BS on either side of the aisle and this one was blatantly dishonest and political.

"For dramatic and narrative purposes the movie contains fictionalized scenes, composite and representative characters and dialogue"

It makes NO pretense that it is factual.

"If people blame Bill Clinton after seeing this, then the miniseries has failed," said Kean, the former Republican New Jersey governor. "That's wrong and it shouldn't happen."

Critics, such as historian Arthur Schlesinger Jr., said it was "disingenuous and dangerous" not to include accurate historical accounts in the movie.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by BMoneeTheMoneeMan on Sep 11th, 2006, 9:51am
I tried to watch some of that show, but I cant take the camera work.  ABC thinks that if the keep moving the camera around, its better TV, but I cant take that shit.  I get motion sick or something.

I have no problem with companies having a political agenda, but it is totally inappropriate to have this shown as a learning tool if it is fiction.  ABC sent out an email or a letter to 100k teachers asking that this movie be shown as history, but it is fictional.  
According to 3 9/11 commissioners, Jaime Gorelick, Richard Ben-Veniste and Tim Roemer, this movie is not accurate at all and is fictional.  

The 9/11 commission and ABC say this movie is fiction, so why do some people say it is factual?

B$
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Kevin_M on Sep 11th, 2006, 9:58am

on 09/11/06 at 09:51:04, BMoneeTheMoneeMan wrote:
The 9/11 commission and ABC say this movie is fiction, so why do some people say it is factual?


That's why I chose a completely different show to watch with a historical agenda.


Quote:
"The Secret History of 9/11"
Title: Re: political thread
Post by zwibbs/Scott on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:36am

on 09/10/06 at 16:55:28, Jonny wrote:
US Navy welcomes the USS Bill Clinton

Sunday, July 2, 2006, Vancouver BC,  headed for Seattle, WA.
The US Navy welcomed the latest member of its fleet today.

http://im1.shutterfly.com/procserv/47b6d731b3127cce8d4bffbf2f0000000016108AZM2bNk5bM6

Pictured above:   The USS William Jefferson Clinton (CVS1) set sail today from its home port of Vancouver, BC.

The ship is the first of its kind in the Navy and is a standing legacy to President Bill Clinton "for his foresight in military budget cuts" and his conduct while president.  The ship is constructed nearly entirely from recycled aluminum and is completely solar powered with a top speed of 5 knots. It boasts an arsenal comprised of one (unarmed) F14 Tomcat or one (unarmed) F18 Hornet aircraft which although they cannot be launched or captured on the 100 foot flight deck but form a very menacing presence.

As a standing order there are no firearms allowed on board. The 20 person crew is completely diversified and includes members of all races, creeds, sex, and sexual orientation. This crew, like the crew aboard the USS Jimmy Carter, is specially trained to avoid conflicts and appease any and all enemies of the United States at all costs.

An on board Type One DNC Universal Translator can send out messages of apology in any language to anyone who may find America offensive. The number of apologies are limitless and though some may sound hollow and disingenuous, the Navy advises all apologies will sound very sincere.

The ship's purpose is not defined so much as a unit of national defense - but instead in times of conflict the USS Clinton has orders to seek refuge in Canada. The ship may be positioned near the Democratic National Party Headquarters for photo-ops and can be used extensively for social experimentation, and whatever other worthless jobs, the ex-commander-in-chief and his wife can think of.

It is largely rumored that the ship will also be the set for the upcoming season of MTV's "The Real World".
The ship was renamed and commissioned USS William J Clinton when someone realized the USS Blowfish was already taken ;;D


                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Excellent !! But isn't Sandy Berger supposed to be on that ship with all the documents stuffed into his drawers ?
Title: Re: political thread
Post by brewcrew on Sep 11th, 2006, 11:57am

on 09/11/06 at 09:51:04, BMoneeTheMoneeMan wrote:
I tried to watch some of that show, but I cant take the camera work.  ABC thinks that if the keep moving the camera around, its better TV, but I cant take that shit.  I get motion sick or something.

It's like "NYPD Blue meets 9/11." I, too, hate that type of camera work. You're not the only one.

On top of that, cut out any commercials. You NEVER get a break. Made for an excruciating evening.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by seasonalboomer on Sep 11th, 2006, 12:12pm
if y'all hated it so much why didn't you just switch the station? that's the beauty of that lil' hand held thing with the buttons.

;;D
Title: Re: political thread
Post by paulc on Sep 11th, 2006, 12:39pm
I've been trying to make sense of jonny's post, but as usual, I have not been successful.  Although President Clinton had been out of office for months before 9/11 and Georgie and his Alzheimer's afflicted cabinet had been in power, already planning to attack Iraq and have it cost us hardly a dime because of all of the oil that we would get as thanks (and he had already spent the surplus Clinton left and was borrowing left and right), and Rummy was threatening to fire any of his generals and admirals who were against invading Iraq (this was all pre 9//11 and the war was already planned and too late to stop) and was insisting that our troops would be greeted with bouqets and seven virgins each and be home in 6 months (and Chaney was off somewhere wondering if he wacked off just ONE MORE TIME if it would blow his pacemaker), 9/11 happened and damn if we didn't have to invade Afganistan first (anyone notice that the Taliban are on the upswing lately?), we took care of that and then invaded Iraq, what with its weapons of "mass destruction (or more likely "mass-turbation" or "mass-turbans", I forget which), somehow jonny ties this all together and decides that it is not only Clinton's fault but Carter's as well (and you might throw in FDR and Harry Truman and John Kennedy and LBJ as well) that we are not winning the war, that the situation in Iraq and Afganistan gets worse each day (except for the warlords who were appointed Provincial Governors and have had a record opium crop this year) and jonny says THAT THIS IS ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!  I can't figure it out, nor can I figure out why old Osama is still alive and well, but IT IS ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!  If someone, other than jonny, can explain this to me using proper English, I would grealty appreciate it and I too might become convinced that everything bad that has happened to the US since George took office-not just the war(s), but the ecomomy, etc., then I too might become convinced that it is ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!  Thank you very much, whoever you are out there who will clarify the situation for me.  "In Hoc Signo Vinces"-we will all be in hock up to our necks if things continue the way that they have been-oh, and Lucky Strike Means Fine Tobacco! [smiley=smokin.gif]

Since this is so long, let us call it a "political quilt" instead of a "political thread". :)
Title: Re: political thread
Post by MJ on Sep 11th, 2006, 12:40pm
I watched it too and enjoyed it. A good show.

Every single commercial was pulled in my area for it. Thus it ended the first part 25 minutes early. Disclaimers to being factual were installed at the beginning and the end. ABC had to have lost a lot of money to air it.

Interesting if you read the posted link by Ivanov who the producers and director were. Zealots on a mission.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Ghost on Sep 11th, 2006, 2:51pm

on 09/11/06 at 12:39:57, paulc wrote:
I've been trying to make sense of jonny's post, but as usual, I have not been successful.  Although President Clinton had been out of office for months before 9/11 and Georgie and his Alzheimer's afflicted cabinet had been in power, already planning to attack Iraq and have it cost us hardly a dime because of all of the oil that we would get as thanks (and he had already spent the surplus Clinton left and was borrowing left and right), and Rummy was threatening to fire any of his generals and admirals who were against invading Iraq (this was all pre 9//11 and the war was already planned and too late to stop) and was insisting that our troops would be greeted with bouqets and seven virgins each and be home in 6 months (and Chaney was off somewhere wondering if he wacked off just ONE MORE TIME if it would blow his pacemaker), 9/11 happened and damn if we didn't have to invade Afganistan first (anyone notice that the Taliban are on the upswing lately?), we took care of that and then invaded Iraq, what with its weapons of "mass destruction (or more likely "mass-turbation" or "mass-turbans", I forget which), somehow jonny ties this all together and decides that it is not only Clinton's fault but Carter's as well (and you might throw in FDR and Harry Truman and John Kennedy and LBJ as well) that we are not winning the war, that the situation in Iraq and Afganistan gets worse each day (except for the warlords who were appointed Provincial Governors and have had a record opium crop this year) and jonny says THAT THIS IS ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!  I can't figure it out, nor can I figure out why old Osama is still alive and well, but IT IS ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!  If someone, other than jonny, can explain this to me using proper English, I would grealty appreciate it and I too might become convinced that everything bad that has happened to the US since George took office-not just the war(s), but the ecomomy, etc., then I too might become convinced that it is ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!  Thank you very much, whoever you are out there who will clarify the situation for me.  "In Hoc Signo Vinces"-we will all be in hock up to our necks if things continue the way that they have been-oh, and Lucky Strike Means Fine Tobacco! [smiley=smokin.gif]

Since this is so long, let us call it a "political quilt" instead of a "political thread". :)

Wow that is pertty good usage of English including slang.
I am impressed, not only did you get most of your facts wrong but you even was able to quote old tv commercials.
I could attempt to debate all day long about howmany mis-statements you have in this but I have a feeling it would fall on deaf ears. All that would do is force you to manuver to yet another invented talking point and along with your premise of who and what you are spew forth yet more lies and invented factoids. Like most trolls I see you have an agenda and part of it seems to attempt to discredit a respected member of the CH community, ok several of them. I have a feeling you will start showing you are brave by stating you have an extensive military career, and or a long history of it in your family. There are several here that can match and probably excede it without even a sigh. But those will not be the ones you go after will they? It will be those you are either unsure of or through your past incarnations have drawn out info on them. You can do yourself and others a huge favor by not trying you petty personal attacks, discuss the topic at hand, or just be silent if you have nothing intelligent to say. Using big works or attempting to quote others or even latin phrases doesn't make it intelligent, it just makes you appear to be childish and petty. Being Louder or more long winded doesn't make you right.

Ok I think I am finished now.
Oh and attacking me is about as useful as petting the wind.

Mike
Title: Re: political thread
Post by brewcrew on Sep 11th, 2006, 3:17pm

on 09/11/06 at 12:12:34, seasonalboomer wrote:
if y'all hated it so much why didn't you just switch the station? that's the beauty of that lil' hand held thing with the buttons.

;;D

I didn't say anything about the content in my post. I thought the content was excellent. It's when they try to dramatize it through "new, creative photography" that it started to make my head hurt.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Charlie on Sep 11th, 2006, 7:37pm
I missed the broadcast? Woe is me I guess.  :o

The Republicans and that selfish thing in the White House control both houses and the Executive. They have no excuses.

An example is that Bush used the attack on the Cole and that the Democrats did nothing...as an election tactic. After the election, he ignored it for 8 months until 9/11.

Charlie
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Jonny on Sep 11th, 2006, 7:40pm
Uh oh, Charlies got a political bonner.....LMAO ;;D
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:03pm

on 09/11/06 at 19:37:46, Charlie wrote:
The Republicans and that selfish thing in the White House control both houses and the Executive.


Thank God.....but in a couple years maybe we can get rid of Preident Bush and get a real conservitive in office. For such a selfish thing he has sure spent mega bucks and increased spending on almost every social entitlement anyone Democrat and Republican put out there.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Charlie on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:03pm
Not really.....  ::)

It helps me remember if I post it. I love reading all the favorable posts that follow. You guys are so fuckin' sweet.  http://www.kolobok.wrg.ru/smiles/remake/close_tema.gif?SSImageQuality=Full

Charlie
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:05pm
LOL polls go up and polls go down, reality stays the same.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by BMoneeTheMoneeMan on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:11pm
I dont think so Matt.  I personally think we are going to have a moderate republican in office.  Bush is pretty liberal, but he says he is conservative, so some people think he is conservative.  I don't think a true conservative could get in office in 2008.

Of course, the republicans could probably run the Devil himself and the democrats wouldnt be smart enough to win the campaign.  I mean, come on, who is it gonna be, H. Clinton and John Kerry?
Gimme a break, the dems deserve to lose.

B$
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:15pm
WOW
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Jonny on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:16pm

on 09/11/06 at 20:15:26, maffumatt wrote:
WOW


Double WOW ;;D
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:29pm
I would love to see Hillary run.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Jonny on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:31pm

on 09/11/06 at 20:29:09, maffumatt wrote:
I would love to see Hillary run.


Your on your own on this one, Matt.....I never want to see those cankles do anything.....LMAO ;;D
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:34pm
With her skeletons Charles Mansion could beat her in an election........
Title: Re: political thread
Post by ivanov on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:35pm
You know you guys are right - I fill a conversion coming on Republican Party here I come. Alleluia!

http://www.thefrown.com/frowners/becomerepublican.swf
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Jonny on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:38pm
http://im1.shutterfly.com/procserv/47b3ce02b3127cce9fbec1c3ab0700000016108AZM2bNk5bM6
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 8:42pm
http://www.bocanews.com/index.php?src=news&prid=10127&category=Local%20News%20%20

See therapy does work.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by BMoneeTheMoneeMan on Sep 11th, 2006, 9:09pm
No wait!!!
How about Clinton with Mrs Landrieu as VP candidate?


Now THERE's a winning ticket, huh?
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 9:14pm
Only if they were running against Cheney/DeLay..........
ROFLMAO!!!!
Title: Re: political thread
Post by tanner on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:07pm

 Charlie, I luv ya no matter which side of the fence you are on at any given time 8)

 Gotta say I do like Jonny's new first responder vessel. I think we should commission a whole fleet of them to protect Hollywood!

 Betcha Martin Sheen would quit his day job to captain one of those babies ;;D

....Tim
Title: Re: political thread
Post by paulc on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:28pm

on 09/11/06 at 14:51:53, Ghost wrote:
Wow that is pertty good usage of English including slang.
I am impressed, not only did you get most of your facts wrong but you even was able to quote old tv commercials.
I could attempt to debate all day long about howmany mis-statements you have in this but I have a feeling it would fall on deaf ears. All that would do is force you to manuver to yet another invented talking point and along with your premise of who and what you are spew forth yet more lies and invented factoids. Like most trolls I see you have an agenda and part of it seems to attempt to discredit a respected member of the CH community, ok several of them. I have a feeling you will start showing you are brave by stating you have an extensive military career, and or a long history of it in your family. There are several here that can match and probably excede it without even a sigh. But those will not be the ones you go after will they? It will be those you are either unsure of or through your past incarnations have drawn out info on them. You can do yourself and others a huge favor by not trying you petty personal attacks, discuss the topic at hand, or just be silent if you have nothing intelligent to say. Using big works or attempting to quote others or even latin phrases doesn't make it intelligent, it just makes you appear to be childish and petty. Being Louder or more long winded doesn't make you right.

Ok I think I am finished now.
Oh and attacking me is about as useful as petting the wind.

Mike


Typical asswipe response-I had most of the facts wrong but you didn't "have time" to point out what was wrong.
You accuse me of getting most of my facts wrong but don't tell me what you think are the real facts-that would take your precious time.  You have not proven me wrong on anything that I've written and that is because my facts are correct or you can't read and write enough to do so.  I really enjoy postings from folks like you; it shows that in America the dumbest of the dumb can write the most idiotic drivel and is still protected by the First Amendment and I admire your country for that.  Of course, should Georgie have his way, that won't exist any longer and you'll have to lick his ass everytime he says something and say "Yassah, Boss" or risk going to one of his not-so-secret-anymore jails for "political reindoctrination".  I won't bother to try to insult you, you did a good enough job yourself!  Loser :) :P
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:43pm
Remember parisites carry diseses, please don't feed them.
http://pathy.fujita-hu.ac.jp/~tsutsumi/image/200/7.jpg
Title: Re: political thread
Post by tanner on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:45pm
AMEN!

modified to add EWWWWW YUCK.....Matt
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Tom K on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:45pm

on 09/11/06 at 12:39:57, paulc wrote:
I've been trying to make sense of jonny's post,
-Did ya?
but as usual, I have not been successful.  Although President Clinton had been out of office for months before 9/11 and Georgie and his Alzheimer's afflicted cabinet had been in power, already planning to attack Iraq
Were they?
and have it cost us hardly a dime because of all of the oil that we would get as thanks (and he had already spent the surplus Clinton left and was borrowing left and right), and Rummy was threatening to fire any of his generals and admirals who were against invading Iraq (this was all pre 9//11 and the war was already planned and too late to stop)
Was it?
and was insisting that our troops would be greeted with bouqets and seven virgins each and be home in 6 months (and Chaney was off somewhere wondering if he wacked off just ONE MORE TIME if it would blow his pacemaker), 9/11 happened and damn if we didn't have to invade Afganistan first (anyone notice that the Taliban are on the upswing lately?), we took care of that and then invaded Iraq, what with its weapons of "mass destruction (or more likely "mass-turbation" or "mass-turbans", I forget which), somehow jonny ties this all together and decides that it is not only Clinton's fault but Carter's as well Did he?
(and you might throw in FDR and Harry Truman and John Kennedy and LBJ as well) that we are not winning the war, that the situation in Iraq and Afganistan gets worse each day (except for the warlords who were appointed Provincial Governors and have had a record opium crop this year) and jonny says THAT THIS IS ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!  I can't figure it out, nor can I figure out why old Osama is still alive and well, but IT IS ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!  If someone, other than jonny, can explain this to me using proper English, I would grealty appreciate it and I too might become convinced that everything bad that has happened to the US since George took office-not just the war(s), but the ecomomy, etc., then I too might become convinced that it is ALL CLINTON'S FAULT!  Thank you very much, whoever you are out there who will clarify the situation for me.  "In Hoc Signo Vinces"-we will all be in hock up to our necks if things continue the way that they have been-oh, and Lucky Strike Means Fine Tobacco! [smiley=smokin.gif]

Since this is so long, let us call it a "political quilt" instead of a "political thread". :)Should we?


Blah, blah blah blah blah...The picture and description of what Jonny posted is called satire:

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source new!
sat-ire [sat-ahyuhr] Show Spelled Pronunciation[sat-ahyuhr]

–noun 1. the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.  
2. a literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule.  
3. a literary genre comprising such compositions.  


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: 1500–10; < L satira, var. of satura medley, perh. fem. deriv. of satur sated (see saturate)]


—Synonyms 1. See irony1. 2, 3. burlesque, caricature, parody, travesty. Satire, lampoon refer to literary forms in which vices or follies are ridiculed. Satire, the general term, often emphasizes the weakness more than the weak person, and usually implies moral judgment and corrective purpose: Swift's satire of human pettiness and bestiality. Lampoon refers to a form of satire, often political or personal, characterized by the malice or virulence of its attack: lampoons of the leading political figures.
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.


Maybe they don't have such a word in the Netherlands language...since you seem to be up on everything that is going on over here, maybe you should look that one up...oh wait...I almost forgot the best part....


For the benefit of new people paulc is our resident troll. He serves no purpose except to confuse, obfuscate and distress posters while providing a wealth of misinformation of his own.  
 
The best response to him is no response. All we do is inform people as best we can that his posts are unsound.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by andrewjb on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:51pm

on 09/11/06 at 20:29:09, maffumatt wrote:
I would love to see Hillary run.

:),you mean for the local bus i hope !
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Mrs Deej on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:55pm

on 09/11/06 at 22:43:43, maffumatt wrote:
Remember parisites carry diseses, please don't feed them.
http://pathy.fujita-hu.ac.jp/~tsutsumi/image/200/7.jpg

LMAO!!!

This is so disgusting...it gives me the ebie gibies!!!

GROSS!!!!!!!!!!

I feel like stuff is crawlin on me!

BTW..."it's" gone!  ;)
Title: Re: political thread
Post by maffumatt on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:59pm
Thank you very much.
Title: Re: political thread
Post by Kevin_M on Sep 11th, 2006, 10:59pm
Thank you Stephie!   You ARE a DOLL!!


Clusterheadaches.com Message Board » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.1!
YaBB © 2000-2003. All Rights Reserved.