Clusterheadaches.com Message Board


    
      
        Clusterheadaches.com Message Board
        (http://www.clusterheadaches.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi)
      

        New Message Board Archives >> 2006 General Board Posts >> South Dakota
        
(Message started by: _Lee_ on Mar 7^th, 2006, 3:00am)

Title: South Dakota
Post by _Lee_ on Mar 7^th, 2006, 3:00am

How many of the women here would move to South Dakota?

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/14033619.htm

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Charlotte on Mar 7^th, 2006, 3:39pm

Not I. Too cold there.

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by imnotbub on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:01pm

Nobody lives in South Dakota. If somebody sais different, they are telling stories.

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Dragnlance on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:04pm

they got pheasants there ;;D

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by ABarham on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:06pm

I'm originally from Kansas. That's enough midwest and cold for me. SD sucks in the winter. BURRRRRRRRRR

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by ABarham on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:07pm

Of course, the question I was supposed to ask is "why do you pose this question?"

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by tanner on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:11pm

They have pheasants in Kansas too and the girls are better lookin 8)

..............tim

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by nani on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:13pm

on 03/07/06 at 16:07:47, ABarham wrote:

Of course, the question I was supposed to ask is "why do you pose this question?"

I think he may have been wanting to watch a debate on abortion. I'm sick of debates, which is why I'm not posting to this thread. ::)

Title: Read the article at the link he
Post by Richr8 on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:14pm

on 03/07/06 at 16:07:47, ABarham wrote:

Of course, the question I was supposed to ask is "why do you pose this question?"

follow the link on his post.

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by _Lee_ on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:14pm

on 03/07/06 at 16:07:47, ABarham wrote:

Of course, the question I was supposed to ask is "why do you pose this question?"

Click on the link :)

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Ghost on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:16pm

on 03/07/06 at 16:13:23, nani wrote:

I think he may have been wanting to watch a debate on abortion. I'm sick of debates, which is why I'm not posting to this thread. ::)

I agree got to be why, I guess he didnt see the TROLL thread. But I too wont post here either. ;;D

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by _Lee_ on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:17pm

on 03/07/06 at 16:13:23, nani wrote:

I think he may have been wanting to watch a debate on abortion. I'm sick of debates, which is why I'm not posting to this thread. ::)

Most likely wouldn'd apply anyway nani

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Melissa on Mar 7^th, 2006, 4:46pm

If I wanted to live in South Dakota, I would be living there right now. I ain't never gonna anyway, cause I love Wisconsin too much! ;;D

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Charlotte on Mar 7^th, 2006, 5:01pm

Now that I read the link, I'll just say I have 5 kids.

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by vietvet2tours on Mar 7^th, 2006, 5:09pm

just so ya know we Montana folks avoid S.D. like the plague.As for North Dakota it's just there. Potter

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by TomM on Mar 7^th, 2006, 5:29pm

on 03/07/06 at 16:04:49, Dragnlance wrote:

they got pheasants there ;;D

What about Quails, VP's or lawyers?

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by chewy on Mar 7^th, 2006, 6:56pm

Aren't there any detox facilities in Oaklahoma?

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Sean_C on Mar 7^th, 2006, 7:01pm

I know there must be Gin Mills.

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Bob P on Mar 7^th, 2006, 7:06pm

My future son-in-law is directing an episode of Deadwood on HBO. That's in SD.

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Kris_in_SJ on Mar 7^th, 2006, 8:25pm

Board of Directors Member - Mid-Michigan Planned Parenthood Alliance.

Let's not go there please?

Kris

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Sean_C on Mar 7^th, 2006, 8:28pm

on 03/07/06 at 20:25:18, Kris_in_SJ wrote:

Let's not go there please?

I'll second that, this thread is sour.

Sean.................................

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by cootie on Mar 7^th, 2006, 8:31pm

They also wanted to ban and protest Sturgis bike rally cuz of this:

South Dakota - Former U.S. Rep. and Gov. Bill Janklow's law license will be reinstated on Feb. 15, the South Dakota Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

His law license was suspended after a jury found him guilty in December 2003 of second-degree manslaughter for killing Randy Scott of Hardwick, Minn.

Scott was on a motorcycle that smashed into the side of a car Janklow drove past a Moody County stop sign in August 2003.

Janklow, a former four-term governor, resigned from Congress after the accident. The Republican politician spent 100 days in jail, was put on probation and cannot drive for three years.

The court's decision agrees with a recommendation by the State Bar's Disciplinary Board.

Circuit Judge Rodney Steele, who sentenced Janklow after his manslaughter trial, had recommended that Janklow's law license not be returned until his probation is finished in January of 2007

I hate banners and protesters Pam

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by chewy on Mar 7^th, 2006, 8:33pm

Quote:

I'll second that, this thread is sour.

What do you expect? One of the most offensive, class less individuals ever to post here started it.

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Sean_C on Mar 7^th, 2006, 8:36pm

I couldn't agree with you more Chewy.

Nothing productive is gonna come out of this thread, its bait.

Sean.....................................

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Jonny on Mar 7^th, 2006, 8:53pm

We dont need to start it, we need to finish it.

Lets keep it at that! ;)

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by _Lee_ on Mar 7^th, 2006, 11:19pm

on 03/07/06 at 18:56:58, chewy wrote:

Aren't there any detox facilities in Oaklahoma?

Where is that don, can't find it on the map ;;D

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by _Lee_ on Mar 7^th, 2006, 11:33pm

on 03/07/06 at 20:33:27, chewy wrote:

What do you expect? One of the most offensive, class less individuals ever to post here started it.

This thread wasn't intended for you dudes, do you even wonder what happened to the disability thread? This is a concern to many women, why do you degrade them with your sarcastic commentary.

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by Sean_C on Mar 7^th, 2006, 11:47pm

on 03/07/06 at 23:33:03, _Lee_ wrote:

This thread wasn't intended for you dudes, do you even wonder what happened to the disability thread? This is a concern to many women, why do you degrade them with your sarcastic commentary.

The line has been cast. :-X

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by maffumatt on Mar 7^th, 2006, 11:48pm

no ones biting Lee, everyone here knows the true reason you posted this.

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by cootie on Mar 8^th, 2006, 12:03am

can we abort this thread.........miscarrage of justice Pam

Title: Re: South Dakota
Post by _Lee_ on Mar 8^th, 2006, 12:17am

Sorry to bother you people I just wondered? why don't we get all pissed about it and start another shit storm? That would be the smart thing to do. I asked a simple question about what I think is an important issue, Excuse me.