|
||
Title: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by snuffster on Apr 13th, 2003, 10:46pm I'm male, so I'll start this by saying I mean no disrespect at all, but I was wondering, for those of you out there who have given birth that get clusters, how does the pain rate? I know that giving birth has to be more painful, but just wondering how far below a Kip 10 is. I think I'm just tired of people saying to me so what does your HA feel like? I normally say It fell like a hot drill 18V Dewalt Drill is going in above my eye, but since most people haven't had that happen, they just laugh at me. Depending how much prednisone, or what ever other steroid is in my system at the time, I either laugh back or throw something at them. I was just trying to think of something more painful then a CH for a comparison, because I know when I'm in a K10 I'd rather be hit by a car then deal with it for another second. Also, this is only my second or third post, I just want to thank you all for be so great! |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by catlind on Apr 13th, 2003, 11:15pm Sorry snuffster, but I have to disagree. Birth was not more painful than CH. It's an entirely different pain, but it is not unbearable. Hurts like a mother fucker no question, and I went natural, but it doesn't compare to a CH. A CH will drop you flat in a matter of seconds. Labo(u)r pains start slow and build, so you adjust to them. If labo(u)r started out at the 9cm stage, then it would compare ... but it would be equal, not worse, in my experience. I think CH is worse probably because labo(u)r pains are caused by muscle contractions, not nerve pain. Cat |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by Mastifflvr28 on Apr 13th, 2003, 11:18pm hey snuffster, Birth is a 4 compared to ch's. :) try birthing a watermelon out yer eye socket...tell them that. Mast |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by don on Apr 13th, 2003, 11:20pm Quote:
Hit by a car numerous times while being beaten with thorn bushes, bled dry by leeches, and kicked in the groin by circus midgets. Well maybe not in the groin. |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by Mark C on Apr 14th, 2003, 12:13am |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by Karla on Apr 14th, 2003, 6:27am I gave birth to twins naturally with complications they were born 1 1/2 hours apart. I was in hard labor for 12 hours before the first one was born and hard labor the whole time between births. Maybe a kip8 My third child I didn't even know I was in labor and almost missed getting to the hospital on time. What pain I ask? Maybe a kip3 CH is the worst pain I know of. |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by TomM on Apr 14th, 2003, 6:48am on 04/13/03 at 22:46:23, snuffster wrote:
I don't know nuffin' bout birfin' no babies but...I've been known to run a few dowm w/ my Expediton. ;) TomM |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by Mikey on Apr 14th, 2003, 7:27am Guys,and Gals, what do you think about kidney stones? Where do you think they fit in as far as a comparison? I've past a total now of 26 stones, some very large (5-6mm) to ones i could'nt pass and had to have surgery like a 10mm stone. Then you have stones that are anywhere from 1-4mm. In my opinion any stone that can be past with no surgery involved, dosen't touch the pain of a Kip10. in comparison 1-4mm feels like a kip4, 5-6mm feels like a kip7, by the way, the biggest stone you can usually pass is a 6mm,anything above that is surgery. So my opinion is that a kidney stone pain could only reach a kip7 in comparison to CH's. Anyone else have kidney stones, that can give a comparison to CH pain? Mikey, ;D BTW: Docs that don't know anything about CH, will tell you that kidney stones are among the worst pain known to man. So maybe you can use this analogy right along with the birth anology. to help them understand the pain scale, especially if you have a medical history of either the stones or birth. ;D |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by Mark C on Apr 14th, 2003, 7:52am on 04/14/03 at 06:48:42, TomM wrote:
|
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by NotH20 on Apr 14th, 2003, 10:23am Hey snuff - I would have to agree with Cat on this one - ch's are a heck of a lot worse than giving birth. YES even after 25 hours of labor with my second daughter. One other thing is that there is a "reward" after giving birth - the only reward after a ch is just waiting for the next one to hit ya down. The beast tends to make your patience null and void. Mikey - sorry, but I can't give my 2 cents on the kidney stones - thank goodness I don't have them! :) Snuff - use ANY sort of story to try to explain just how painful these ch's are. The Dewalt is a good one and the kidney stones are good as well. I really like Mast's watermelon out your eye socket! ;) DrkAngl could really give you some good things to say - is Drk still around???? Mia |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by Roxy on Apr 14th, 2003, 10:35am On a scale of 1-10. Childbirth runs around a 5. Ch's a definite 10. There is no comparison. I did the childbirths naturally, and I'd take it over and over again in comparison to clusters. I've also had 8 major knee surgeries. All involving tendon grafts, ligament grafts, cadaver grafts and holes drilled into the bones....etc. Still doesn't touch a cluster on the pain scale. The walking on crutchs for 9 months afterwards is a pain in the ass though. Tracey |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by hanisdee on Apr 14th, 2003, 5:12pm I have had three babies two of which were 100% natural and one with an epidural. A cluster headache is much worse and nothing to show for it in the end, except for a "hangover"!!!! Chrissy |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by Wendy the Brit on Apr 14th, 2003, 5:19pm I'm with all of you on this one, childbirth wasn't exactly fun but I'd rather do it anyday than have a Kip 10. And you get loads of help and sympathy with childbirth, everyone has seen it on the telly and can half imagine how much it hurts. With CH no-one sees or understands and very few sympathise. I also believe that a pain in your brain is the most terrifying pain of all. I never lost control and panicked in labour, but I did in my worst CH. Hubby was holding me down then to stop me hurting myself, he only had to hold my hand in labour! W the B |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by Jarvis on Apr 14th, 2003, 8:45pm You women have no idea how difficult it is giving birth... Now some of us guys would compare it to a kip 10... We are usually at it for several days and even weeks before the child actually comes. We get up in the middle of the night go to the hospital half a dozen times for the first kid. (sorta like a 2 week CH cycle.) . We are constantly straining ourselves tring to feel something every time she says did you feel that. Even though we cant feel a bloody thing, we have to lie and say oh yeah. By the time the kid finally comes some of us are bloodied up from the squeezing and tearing of our skin. Not only that we have to either come and watch or pace like we have a CH sometimes for hours on end. While you all are getting coddled and laying back. (Thank god for anesthesia makes me feel better doc allways got pissed when I grabbed the mask) Afterwards we have to start calling a list of people to tell them she/he was so big and so fat, like a fish we just pulled outa the water, and then try and diagnose who excactly do they look like, again we have to lie and say looks excactly like so and so. (even though new babies are pretty ugly. after a few days they look excactly like me) Not only that but after calling 100 people I never heard of and repeating the story so many times, we have to come up with a name for the kid with moms in some kinda wierd frame of mind. I'd just as soon call em all Joe, but its impossible to negotiate this untill after about 3 months. Then while moms resting sometimes heaven forbid we gotta change them damn diapers but thats another story. But the part I hate the worst is when the baby tries sucking on MY breasts. How embarrassing! The exhaustion we men endure is akin to a 3 month CH cycle. So in answer to your questin snuffster I would compare giving birth to a k8 on the cluster scale. But then I have to be fair and say I never had less than a k10 so maybe theres no comparison. |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by suzy617 on Apr 15th, 2003, 5:06am Birthing babies, a piece of cake. I was put under both times so I missed out on all the pain. The only other pain in my life I could compare to a KIP10 would have to be when my fallopian tube ruptured. Unbelievably painful, felt like (im guessing) being shot in the stomach. With that pain I couldnt move at all but with a CH laying still is not an option. suzy |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by NotH20 on Apr 15th, 2003, 7:35am Very clever Jarvis! ;) Enjoyed that post. Mia |
||
Title: Re: Kip 10 Vs. Giving Birth Post by achinghead on Apr 15th, 2003, 8:26pm i had kidney stones about a month ago. I went from 5 pm til finally passing it around 1145 that night.. I dont think it compares with a CH... not at all.. Even though it was the 2nd worst pain Ive ever had it still doesnt compare.. I read that the comparison is like"amputation without anesthetic" but I wouldnt know that either... just my thought on kidney stones.. incidently.. Passed it while in the midst of my cycle(which still isnt over) |
||
Clusterheadaches.com Message Board » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.1! YaBB © 2000-2003. All Rights Reserved. |