Author |
Topic: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM (Read 863 times) |
|
BlueMeanie
Guest
|
Saturday, January 10
Tennessee Titans (13-4) @ New England Patriots (14-2)
Carolina Panthers (12-5) @ St. Louis Rams (12-4)
Sunday, January 11
Green Bay Packers (11-6) @ Philadelphia Eagles (12-4)
Indianapolis Colts (13-4) @ Kansas City Chiefs (13-3)
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
Cerberus
New Board Hall of Famer
Whomever said that two heads are better than one?
Gender: 
Posts: 2117
|
 |
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #1 on: Jan 4th, 2004, 9:53pm » |
 Quote  Modify
|
Titans
Rams
Eagles
Chiefs
|
|
IP Logged |
I would rather face the end with terror than terror without end. - (Deitrich Sawatsky 194?)
|
|
|
BlueMeanie
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #2 on: Jan 4th, 2004, 9:56pm » |
Quote Modify
 Remove
|
Rams, Patriots, Colts, Packers
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Cerberus
New Board Hall of Famer
Whomever said that two heads are better than one?
Gender:
Posts: 2117
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #3 on: Jan 4th, 2004, 10:16pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Ok so lemme get this straight..........
The Colts score 40+ points ONE time (not even during the regular season) and suddenly they are the favorite? Do You guys know where this game is being played AND how many times the Chiefs have scored 40+ during regular season play? I don't care how much improved the Indy D is they don't have enough to stop the nfl's highest scoring offense. AND with a healthy defense The chiefs will stop the run game sufficiently to quell the Indy attack.
You can say the stats don't matter,but, keep in mind its what got em there in the first place. Its the PATS that bug me most. I have confidence that KC will prevail at least in this round 
Ramon
|
|
IP Logged |
I would rather face the end with terror than terror without end. - (Deitrich Sawatsky 194?)
|
|
|
Renee
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
May we all find some pf time! Is it summer yet?
Gender: 
Posts: 1060
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #4 on: Jan 4th, 2004, 10:29pm » |
Quote Modify
|
patriots
rams
eagles (although I want Favre to win it all)
priest holmes
|
|
IP Logged |
23 years of battling the beast, 9 years chronic......uneducated docs/nurses make me irate.
The fungus among us is for real!
|
|
|
jimmers
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
Hello GOD! The gene pool needs some chlorine!
Gender:
Posts: 2092
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #5 on: Jan 4th, 2004, 10:48pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Pats: Home team, big advantage!
Pans: Great D, Get in either SLR QB'S face and they'll fold
Pack: D's a little shakey, but I'll think they can pull it off.
Kans: Great Offense, but the D sucks big time. The Packers should have beat em when they played.
GO PACKERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cheesehead Jimbo
|
|
IP Logged |
I don't suffer from INSANITY; I'm enjoying every minute of it!
|
|
|
Melissa
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #6 on: Jan 4th, 2004, 11:17pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Pats
Rams
Colts
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
TxBasslady
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
Bass fishin' is a h00t It's the catchin' that sux
Gender:
Posts: 3201
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #7 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 12:22am » |
Quote Modify
|
Titans
Panthers
Packers
Chiefs
I got lucky on the 1st round.....LMAO
Doubt I will make it 2
Jean
|
|
IP Logged |
How lucky I am... to have known someone who was so hard to say goodbye too.
Take a kid fishin
www.takemefishin.org
I adopted a Vietnam POW/MIA from El Paso, Texas! 
|
|
|
JDH
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
We will get by, We will survive!
Gender:
Posts: 2453
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #8 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 12:35am » |
Quote Modify
|
Pats
Rams
Eagles
Chiefs
Jim
|
|
IP Logged |
9-11-01, to remember is to honor.
It's not what you know, it's what you can prove.
ECH established 1985
|
|
|
Paigelle
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #9 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 8:03am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
I can actually voice my opinion now that Denver lost. If I pick a team now it won't cause a divorce.
Patriots (they are going to take the Super Bowl)
Rams
Packers
Chiefs
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
thomas
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #10 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 8:11am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
pats
panthers
packers
chefs
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
River_Rat
New Board Old Timer
NUFF SAID!!!
 
Gender:
Posts: 377
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #11 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 11:02am » |
Quote Modify
|
TITANS
PANTHERS
PACKERS
COLTS
NORM
It's funny that all the visiting teams will win!
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Mikey
New Board Hall of Famer
Rock till ya Drop and DON'T mess with the FAM!!!!!
Gender:
Posts: 585
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #12 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 11:25am » |
Quote Modify
|
TITANS
PANTHERS
PACKERS
CHIEFS
GO PANTHERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mikey,
|
|
IP Logged |
I love to ROCK very HARD!!!
CHRONIC and going crazy!! Want to come too?
Hope for PFDAN, peace and safety to you all!!
|
|
|
Jimmy_B
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #13 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 1:21pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
I can't believe so many are picking the Packers over the Eagles...Packers had a horrible outing against an even horribler Seattle. They are not a Super Bowl bound team.
Either Wisconsin has a lot of cluster (as well as cheese) heads or a lot of people hate the Eagles...But hey...the play-offs are sudden-death & anything can happen...I may be eating my words...anyhoo...
Pats
Eagles
Panthers
Chiefs
& then
Pats & Eagles in Super Bowl XXXVIII.
Take it to the bank.
Jim
|
| « Last Edit: Jan 5th, 2004, 1:23pm by Jimmy_B » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Paigelle
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #14 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 1:21pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Patriots are definitely Super Bowl bound.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
BlueMeanie
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #15 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 1:40pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
on Jan 4th, 2004, 10:16pm, Cerberus wrote:Ok so lemme get this straight..........
The Colts score 40+ points ONE time (not even during the regular season) and suddenly they are the favorite? Do You guys know where this game is being played AND how many times the Chiefs have scored 40+ during regular season play? I don't care how much improved the Indy D is they don't have enough to stop the nfl's highest scoring offense. AND with a healthy defense The chiefs will stop the run game sufficiently to quell the Indy attack.
Ramon |
|
Hey ! You talkin' bout my team like that. How dare you !
INDY WLL Kick Butt on them Chiefs .........
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
thomas
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #16 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 1:52pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
on Jan 5th, 2004, 1:21pm, Jimmy_B wrote:| I can't believe so many are picking the Packers over the Eagles...Packers had a horrible outing against an even horribler Seattle. |
|
Uhhhh, did you even see the game? that was the best playoff game I've seen in years......
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Paigelle
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #17 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 2:05pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Packers over Eagles. Favre has placed some his best lately. Like the man can get much better. Also if I say this, Thomas won't fuss at me. j/k
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
thomas
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #18 on: Jan 5th, 2004, 2:23pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
on Jan 5th, 2004, 2:05pm, Paigelle wrote:| Packers over Eagles. Favre has placed some his best lately. Like the man can get much better. Also if I say this, Thomas won't fuss at me. j/k |
|
I'd never fuss at you girl.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jimmy_B
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #19 on: Jan 6th, 2004, 10:16am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
on Jan 5th, 2004, 1:52pm, thomas wrote:
Uhhhh, did you even see the game? that was the best playoff game I've seen in years...... |
|
Ok, maybe horrible was a little off the mark...but I still find it hard to believe the percentage of people who believe the Packers wil win.
Consider this:
Since the NFL adopted the 12-team playoff format in 1990, home teams in the conference semifinal round are 43-9.
NFC teams during that 13-year period are 24-2.
As the fourth-seeded team, the Packers go to Philadelphia knowing the teams previously seeded No. 4 in the NFC were 0-13 teams in divisional games.
The last time the Packers won in Philly was 1962.
Since then, the Packers have made five trips to Philadelphia and went away losers each time.
And Brett Favre never won in Philly.
The last time the Eagles won in Lambeau was less than two months ago.
Brett Favre has only 1 career TD pass in Philadelphia.
The NFC's No. 1 seed has not lost in the Divisional round since 1987, when the wild-card Minnesota Vikings went to San Francisco and knocked off Steve Young and the mighty 49ers 36-24.
The odds are stacked. I wish I was a betting man.
That said...these two teams know each other well. Both Quarter-backs were schooled by the same coaching staff. Brett has the experience, Donovan is healthy. Westbrook is out. It should be a very good game...probably down to the wire.
Jim
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
jminmilwaukee
New Board Old Timer
Gender:
Posts: 384
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #20 on: Jan 6th, 2004, 10:24am » |
Quote Modify
|
Statistics are made to be broken.
If Green has a good running game, we (the Packers) will be victorious. The eagles have one of the worst run defenses and Green just happens to be the best running back in the NFL right now.
I do believe we can pull it off but it could be tricky with the emotion of the "ugly" Philly fan base in the city of not so brotherly love.
And yeah, the Seahawks / Packers game was the most intense playoff game in recent memory with two very good teams battling to the end.
Horrible my arse  .
jmin
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jimmy_B
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #21 on: Jan 6th, 2004, 10:27am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
on Jan 6th, 2004, 10:24am, jminmilwaukee wrote:Statistics are made to be broken.
I do believe we can pull it off but it could be tricky with the emotion of the "ugly" Philly fan base in the city of not so brotherly love.
Horrible my arse .
jmin |
|
Who you calling ugly....Peckerhead I almost forgot to put in the smiley face...
|
| « Last Edit: Jan 6th, 2004, 10:31am by Jimmy_B » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
jminmilwaukee
New Board Old Timer
Gender:
Posts: 384
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #22 on: Jan 6th, 2004, 10:41am » |
Quote Modify
|
That would be pAckerhead to you, kind sir.
To clarify, Philly is known for being an evil place to watch your team play. Especially when the visiting team wins.
jmin
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Jimmy_B
Guest
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #23 on: Jan 6th, 2004, 10:56am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
That comes from years of always getting close but never getting to the Super Bowl.  I was 12 when they finally got into Super Bowl XV & lost. Philly is definitely fanatical about our Sports Teams. I think more so then the players.
The majority of Philly fans are great sports. But you're always gonna have the drunken idiots that give you a bad name. Then you have the media. I'm sure everyone's heard that we booed Santa Claus...what they don't tell you is they sent out a guy in a horrible Santa Claus outfit, who was falling down drunk. That's why he was booed.
Good Luck, man. It's gonna be a great game.
Jimmy
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
aprilbee
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
Ain't I a stinkah!!
Gender:
Posts: 1442
|
|
Re: NFL (Round Two) UPICUM
« Reply #24 on: Jan 6th, 2004, 11:50am » |
Quote Modify
|
Titans
Rams
Packers
Colts
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Member Map
Login
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print
test rss