Author |
Topic: Very important but not CH related (Read 582 times) |
|
DonnaHar
Guest
|
 |
Very important but not CH related
« on: Oct 13th, 2005, 11:30am » |
 Quote  Modify
 Remove
|
Please take just a minute to read the letter at
http://letters-to.com/smf/index.php?topic=24.0
I wouldn't normally ask you to do this, but it is too close to home for many of us.
If you can offer a suggestion, please do so.
Thanks,
Donna H
|
|
 IP Logged |
|
|
|
Racer1_NC
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
"Beeeyul the Cat"
Gender: 
Posts: 1887
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #1 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 12:04pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I suggest one think about this in a rational way. Assuming this story is true (which I doubt), there is no way such a cancer treatment could be buried for almost 40 years. FDA stops testing in this country? A doctor with such a revolutionary treatment would just go to another country to conduct trials. Discounting the moral issues, the profit from such a treatment would be beyond description.
I'd file this one right next to the tales of UFOs kidnapping people for medical experiments.
Bill
|
|
IP Logged |
"Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime."
Eventus stultorum magister.
|
|
|
Ronny
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
Yabba Dabba Doo
 
Gender:
Posts: 914
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #2 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 12:07pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Damn, how is that possible.
Suggestion (i know its a poor one):
A lettre to the company that made it back in 1967 to remind them of the miracle drug they made.
Or several lettres to well know cancer specialists.
|
|
IP Logged |
Count your rainbows, not your thunderstorms.
|
|
|
DonnaHar
Guest
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #3 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 12:08pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
It is documented in this man's medical chart that this vaccine was being administered and was working in his favor.
Edited to add: I've heard it said that drug companies do not want to see cures for some diseases, haven't you?
I was and still am in regular contact with this family and know of this happening from 1st hand experience. I was there. His and her entire family were in shock.
Look up "Eernest Ayers" on yahoo, google or whoever and you will find the quote in her letter, but no more. How can that be all there was to be said?
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 13th, 2005, 12:28pm by DonnaHar » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Racer1_NC
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
"Beeeyul the Cat"
Gender:
Posts: 1887
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #4 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 12:20pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 13th, 2005, 12:08pm, DonnaHar wrote:| It is documented in this man's medical chart that this vaccine was being administered and was working in his favor. |
|
You have seen this chart and personally verified it using scientific procedures?
|
|
IP Logged |
"Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime."
Eventus stultorum magister.
|
|
|
Linda_Howell
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
Hearing is one thing. Listening is another.
 
Gender: 
Posts: 6721
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #5 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 12:27pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Quote:
If you can offer a suggestion, please do so.
|
|
The only one I can offer is to let our resident snake-oil/fraud detective look into this more closely.
Ueli where are you?
The fact that the food and drug Administration would pull something like this from the market does NOT surprise me though, so some of this could be accurate.
Linda
|
|
IP Logged |
Kindness, is gladdening the hearts of those who are traveling the dark journey with us.
|
|
|
Gator
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
Gender:
Posts: 4556
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #6 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 12:27pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 13th, 2005, 12:04pm, Racer1_NC wrote:I suggest one think about this in a rational way. Assuming this story is true (which I doubt), there is no way such a cancer treatment could be buried for almost 40 years. FDA stops testing in this country? A doctor with such a revolutionary treatment would just go to another country to conduct trials. Discounting the moral issues, the profit from such a treatment would be beyond description.
I'd file this one right next to the tales of UFOs kidnapping people for medical experiments.
Bill |
|
I'm not normally a conspiracy theorist, but money talks. Look at the automotive industry. Engines and carburators that were capable of 50 mpg in the late 70's were bought up by the corporations potentially affected with loss of profits and haven't been heard of since. I wouldn't put it past a few unscrupulous executives in the medical industry to buy the rights to the vaccine and not produce it. An industry that would pay off researchers to give the okay to potentially harmful drugs would have no problems pulling a med that would cause them to lose money in their chemotherapy and other lines.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
DonnaHar
Guest
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #7 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 12:30pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Please see my edited post above.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Linda_Howell
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
Hearing is one thing. Listening is another.
Gender:
Posts: 6721
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #8 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 12:33pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Quote: I wouldn't put it past a few unscrupulous executives in the medical industry to buy the rights to the vaccine and not produce it. An industry that would pay off researchers to give the okay to potentially harmful drugs would have no problems pulling a med that would cause them to lose money in their chemotherapy and other lines.
|
|
Exactly!
I hate it though....that someone else has my skeptisism of the medical community. lol
Linda
|
|
IP Logged |
Kindness, is gladdening the hearts of those who are traveling the dark journey with us.
|
|
|
Racer1_NC
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
"Beeeyul the Cat"
Gender:
Posts: 1887
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #9 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 1:05pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Quote:An industry that would pay off researchers to give the okay to potentially harmful drugs would have no problems pulling a med that would cause them to lose money in their chemotherapy and other lines.
|
|
True.....but a verified cure for cancer would bring untold riches to those that held the rights to such a cure.
Quote:| Look up "Eernest Ayers" on yahoo, google or whoever and you will find the quote in her letter, but no more. |
|
I did......I even corrected the spelling of the first name and searched that as well.
Quote:| How can that be all there was to be said? |
|
Only goes to prove my point. I can find more on Gator's supposed 50 mpg fuel system than I can this.
Bill
|
|
IP Logged |
"Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime."
Eventus stultorum magister.
|
|
|
Woobie
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
I luv you guys!!!!!!!!
Gender:
Posts: 3800
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #10 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 4:25pm » |
Quote Modify
|
population control.
all the drugs that the drug companies make for cancer treatment..........
the drug companies - they'd lose all that money
the hospitals and doctors... the cancer treatment center... a lot of people out of jobs.
cant have a cure for cancer - cant have a cure for diabetes.
I heard they DO have a cure for diabetes - they just arent releasing it. same with cancer.
HOW could they NOT have a cure for these things? All the money that has been collected for research over the years and NOTHING?
Yea, right.
I dont believe it
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Opus
New Board Hall of Famer
(Insert witty comment here)
Gender:
Posts: 2509
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #11 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 5:01pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I posted what little info I could find, to me it does look like a cover up, because at the time of it happening the story should have been huge. I would like to know if this was a real vaccine for a virus, or it was just called that. If it was then the researchers knew that viruses cause cancer before it was common knowledge.
There are still medical cover ups going on, for example the fact that there is no proof that heart disease is caused by high cholesterol , but maybe in fact caused by C pneumonia. It appears that little has been done to test if antibiotics ( which for most patents have run out) can be a treatment, instead they are pushing their new cholesterol lowering drugs.
Opus/Paul
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 13th, 2005, 5:03pm by Opus » |
IP Logged |
Zed-Zed-nine plural-Zed alpha,
There is no place like home.
|
|
|
Ueli
Guest
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #12 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 7:59pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
I'm very, very skeptical about this suppressed cancer vaccine. As Racer Bill mentioned, it would be extremely difficult to repress any knowledge about such a vaccine, in particular when it already had some success. Also, there should be some traces left in the literature, how it is supposed to work, first results of animal experiments and such.
There are tons of urban legends about greedy industry bosses that withhold for profit reasons useful inventions. Especially in the medical fields this claim is often made by debunked inventors of bogus 'cures'. But in other fields too, from the ever-lasting light bulb to the anti-gravitation machine. While the later would be difficult to find an investor (as it is incompatible to physical laws) there are more plausible victims, as the super carburetor.
While the automobile industry is notorious for not introducing something new just on the grounds that it is better (it must be cheaper too), there is no reason why they should waive a system that would cut the gas cost in half. Think what sales argument that would be with the current gas price!
So let's take a closer look at the 50 mpg carburetor and engine. First, to make any meaning to me I have to convert the 50 mpg to the fucking metric system (  at Randy). It turns out as 4.7 liter / 100 km. Now, gas consumption is more or less proportional to weight of the car, including payload. An average medium European car weighs about a ton (including 2 people) and consumes 7 to 9 liters for 100 km. Easy to bring down consumption down to 4.7 l, just double the efficiency of the engine, isn't it? After all, the efficiency of todays gasoline engines is only 25%, lots of space for improvement. But wait, todays most efficient heat engines, a 1000 MW steam turbine, has an efficiency of not much more than 40%. So a small gas engine with 50% efficiency is mere wishful thinking. For the average American 2 ton gas guzzler to reach 50 mpg an efficiency of over 100% would be needed, or mayhaps an anti-gravitation engine.....
Another legend debunked,
Ueli 
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Lizzie2
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
"L'Chaim"~Hebre w Toast~"To Life"
Gender:
Posts: 4458
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #13 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 8:06pm » |
Quote Modify
|
Hmmm.....
The question I always ask when this issue comes up is, if these cures really do exist and there's a big conspiracy to hide them in a huge money-making scam, why do politicians, doctors, nurses, their families, drug company CEOs, and then some...STILL get cancer?
I'd think if the cure was out there, they'd at least use it for their own benefit.
But maybe that's just me....
Trust me when I say I'd very much prefer to be put out of a job if there were cures for all kinds of hideous things. As would the physicians I work with. Not a single one of us wants to see this suffering day in and day out - no matter how bad a doc or nurse out there, I still don't know a single one who wants to see someone suffer just to make a buck. It's a hard profession - and sadly, one that many take for granted these days.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
BobG
New Board Hall of Famer
Gender:
Posts: 5747
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #14 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 8:25pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I find it hard to believe that a drug company would suppress a vaccine for cancer if it worked. Cancer has been around since the beginning of this world. It will be around for many more centuries, vaccine or no vaccine. For every cancer victim that dies there is another person born with the potential to be cancer victim, and thus, a customer of the drug maker. It’s an endless supply of money.
I have no idea if the Rand Vaccine is for real or not, good or bad, safe or not. My thoughts are, because I’m mostly a cynic and skeptic, the Rand Vaccine was a scam.
But, I went looking anyway and this is what I found (or didn’t find).
James Rand and/or Eernest Ayre
Google: 1967 The FDA stops the use of an experimental cancer vaccine which was producing significant results. Developed by James Rand and Eernest Ayre, a recognized cancer specialist. The Rand vaccine produced significant improvement in terminal patients in over 30% of patients. It cured tumors and breast cancer in four to six months, without radiation, surgery or chemotherapy. (No mention why it was pulled from the market.)
I also searched Quackwatch and Urban Legends and Folklore sites using each of these words: James Rand, Eernest Ayre, US Senator Stephen Young, “How the US Government is Blocking a Cancer Cure”, Rand vaccine, Experimental cancer vaccine. Found nothing.
|
|
IP Logged |
Stay stressed. Never relax. Never sleep. Ever.
|
|
|
sassy_lady
New Board Hall of Famer
Gender:
Posts: 613
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #15 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 9:12pm » |
Quote Modify
|
[quote author=DonnaHar link=board=general;num=1129221005;start=0#3 date=10/13/05 at 12:08:40]It is documented in this man's medical chart that this vaccine was being administered and was working in his favor.
Edited to add: I've heard it said that drug companies do not want to see cures for some diseases, haven't you?
I've heard of that, I beleave they have a cure for cancer, I beleave they have a cure for aids too!!
I've also heard that it's a population control thing !!
just my  worth !!
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Opus
New Board Hall of Famer
(Insert witty comment here)
Gender:
Posts: 2509
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #16 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 9:23pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 13th, 2005, 7:59pm, Ueli wrote:
So let's take a closer look at the 50 mpg carburetor and engine. First, to make any meaning to me I have to convert the 50 mpg to the fucking metric system ( at Randy). It turns out as 4.7 liter / 100 km. Now, gas consumption is more or less proportional to weight of the car, including payload. An average medium European car weighs about a ton (including 2 people) and consumes 7 to 9 liters for 100 km. Easy to bring down consumption down to 4.7 l, just double the efficiency of the engine, isn't it? After all, the efficiency of todays gasoline engines is only 25%, lots of space for improvement. But wait, todays most efficient heat engines, a 1000 MW steam turbine, has an efficiency of not much more than 40%. So a small gas engine with 50% efficiency is mere wishful thinking. For the average American 2 ton gas guzzler to reach 50 mpg an efficiency of over 100% would be needed, or mayhaps an anti-gravitation engine.....
Another legend debunked,
Ueli |
|
This is my take on the car gas mileage topic. 20 years ago cars got about 30 mpg with a large 4 cylinder engine. Today cars weigh 1/2 the amount, not 2 tons, they were 2000 pounds [909kg] then and a 1000 pounds [454kg] or less now. Driving one on a windy day is quite a challenge. With all the advances they have been selling us the fuel mileage is still 30mpg. They say it is because of increases exhaust emission standards, and that could be correct, but it seems like a lot to lose.
Opus/Paul
|
|
IP Logged |
Zed-Zed-nine plural-Zed alpha,
There is no place like home.
|
|
|
Charlie
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
Happy to be here
  
Gender:
Posts: 14968
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #17 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 9:42pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I'm with everyone here. Ueli makes sense but so do Gator and Linda.
Our FDA, especially in this enlightened century, is a Byzantine creation that answers to drug companies and alters scientific research to please politicians in Kansas.
I'd put nothing past them. So far as I know Europe has nothing that comes even close.
More to come on this I hope. 
Charlie 
|
|
IP Logged |
There is nothing more satisfying than being shot at without result---Winston Churchill
|
|
|
BobG
New Board Hall of Famer
Gender:
Posts: 5747
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #18 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 10:06pm » |
Quote Modify
|
I can think of zero reasons why the auto companies would not want to market new cars that get 30 miles per gallon (or 50 or more). They would sell a heck of a lot of them.
Gasoline powered engines are capable of those milages but the trade off is horsepower and torque. You can't have both.
High milage/low power cars might be OK on a small island in the Virgin Isles but on American roads horsepower wins everytime. A 500 cubic inch American V8 can be built and "tuned" to 6 - 7,000 (yep, thousand) horsepower. But, it'll only get about 40 gallons to the mile. And cost about $200,000.
My next door neighbor has a Toyota Prius (sp?) and it's a dang nice car. Quiet, fuel efficient, nice ride, roomy, slow, and ugly as hell! Honda also has a nice car in that class. It'll take the Americans many years to catch on to these cars but when they do there will be hundreds of thousands on the road. 25 years from now the 2004 Toyota will be a collectors item probably worth it's original selling price.
IMHO there is no reason for the car companies to be afraid to bring high milage cars to market. 500,000 cars at $30,000+ each and every year = a bunch of money.
But, I'm not buying one. I'm a firm believer there is no substitute for cubic inches.
Drive it like it's rented! 
|
|
IP Logged |
Stay stressed. Never relax. Never sleep. Ever.
|
|
|
Mr. Happy
CH.com Alumnus
New Board Hall of Famer
If I can do it, it ain't art.
 
Gender:
Posts: 2217
|
|
Not CH related at all..in the least...
« Reply #19 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 11:04pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 13th, 2005, 7:59pm, Ueli wrote:So let's take a closer look at the 50 mpg carburetor and engine.
Another legend debunked, |
|
Ueli......I'm PROUD to be part of Team Realism. No matter how we do the math, we're fucked.
Virgins of the world, have mercy.
RJ
|
|
IP Logged |
May those who don't want any
Have memories of never getting any.
|
|
|
DonnaHar
Guest
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #20 on: Oct 13th, 2005, 11:30pm » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
I asked for help in finding more information on the Rand/Eernest Ayers (no, I didn't misspell it) cancer vaccine. I only found the one paragraph that I suggested you all look up, and nothing more. If you have any suggestions as to where to look for more, I would greatly appreciate it.
I know this case if true. The widow is my sister. I lived this out with them. He was responding, without a doubt. My sister worked for the neurosurgeon who administered the vaccine and also performed John's surgeries.
She has been looking for answers ever since. The doc is no longer alive.
I don't blame some of you for being skeptical and I wasn't going to reveal who the person was, but I guess by not mentioning names, I held up my end of the promise. I'm just trying to prove to you that this is not a dreamed up story.
Now, if any of you remember the late '60's and the Rand vaccine, please send me a note or post it in my Letters column. That thread, when it has a few responses, is really going to the FDA just as all threads in that catagory do.
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 13th, 2005, 11:33pm by DonnaHar » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
BobG
New Board Hall of Famer
Gender:
Posts: 5747
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #21 on: Oct 14th, 2005, 12:07am » |
Quote Modify
|
Sorry to the hijacking of your thread.
This paragraph is much like the one I posted above but mentions a Goddard guy so I searched him. You might want to look also. He might lead you to the info you are looking for.
"1967 The FDA stops the use of an experimental cancer vaccine which was producing significant results. Developed by James Rand and Eernest Ayre, a recognized cancer specialist. The Rand vaccine produced significant improvement in terminal patients in over 30% of patients. It cured tumors and breast cancer in four to six months, without radiation, surgery or chemotherapy. The FDA Commissioner was James L. Goddard, the same man who persecuted the use of DMSO. Goddard used the DMSO issue in 1966 in an attempt to foster a medical dictatorship in the US in collusion with the medical and pharmaceutical industries, and remove viable treatments from public access."
I went to Ask Jeeves and found these. Don’t know if it will help you or not.
I did not Google or Yahoo him.
FDA Commisioner (mentioned above) James L. Goddard
The Joshua Lederberg Papers
http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/BB/G/D/P/H/
http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/BB/G/D/P/H/_/bbgdph.pdf
http://ca.encarta.msn.com/sidebar_1741580110/1968_Drug_Industry.html
This might be of interest……..
“The pharmaceutical industry in particular bore much of Goddard's regulatory enthusiasm; drug recalls grew by nearly 75 percent in his first year.”
More here....click it
http://www.fda.gov/oc/commissioners/goddard.html
|
|
IP Logged |
Stay stressed. Never relax. Never sleep. Ever.
|
|
|
DonnaHar
Guest
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #22 on: Oct 14th, 2005, 12:28am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
Bob, thank you ever so much! I have my work cut out for me tomorrow.
Even more, I did get a response on my website with more to follow up (thank you, too, new member)......and some of the info even mentions Richmond Heights, Ohio, very near where John's docs office was!! In the beginning, 100 patients there were being used in the research and apparently John was one of them.
Anyone wanting to read this response can go to www.letters-to.com
If you care to add to that thread, please feel free to do so.....and remember these threads/letters actually go to the addressee. The more who demand an answer, the greater the chances we'll get a reply.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
DonnaHar
Guest
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #23 on: Oct 14th, 2005, 9:18am » |
Quote Modify
Remove
|
OK, now you'll REALLY know it existed. Take a look at AskJeeves and type in "rand vaccine 1967 Cleveland Press". There's more dead-end information including a few articles from Time Magazine. Check out this:
http://www.jfk-online.com/jpscpaonf.html
and go to the bottom to read the "BTW".
Does anyone know how to look up public records of years ago? I need to find out more about the court hearings.
Thanks
|
| « Last Edit: Oct 14th, 2005, 9:19am by DonnaHar » |
IP Logged |
|
|
|
Pinkfloyd
New Board Hall of Famer
comfortably numb
Gender:
Posts: 1406
|
|
Re: Very important but not CH related
« Reply #24 on: Oct 14th, 2005, 12:32pm » |
Quote Modify
|
on Oct 13th, 2005, 12:04pm, Racer1_NC wrote: FDA stops testing in this country?
Bill |
|
Psilocybin and LSD for headache treatment? 
MJ for AIDS and cancer patients?
Cancer vaccines have been in the news lately..anyone read newspapers anymore 
I think you'd also find that vaccine research for cancer has been going on a long time.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9609603/
Bobw
|
|
IP Logged |
"Nothing is so firmly believed as what we least know."
"There is no passion so contagious as that of fear."
[Michel de Montaigne
www.clusterbusters.com
www.obscuredview.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Search
Members
Member Map
Login
Register
Reply
Notify of replies
Send Topic
Print
test rss